Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ideal terminated Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces, φ Ag = 428.78 kJ mol -1 54 and φ Au = 509.5 kJ mol -1 , resulting in Δ E ct = 80.7 kJ mol -1 . For water, Δ E Me - solv = −5 kJ/mol has been estimated . Differences in TU electrodesorption peak energies (Table ) from Ag(111) ( E C1 = −1.21 V) and Au(111) substrates ( E C1 = −0.83 V) 33 are Δ E C1 = −0.38 V = 36.7 kJ mol -1 in a single-electron charge-transfer process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ideal terminated Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces, φ Ag = 428.78 kJ mol -1 54 and φ Au = 509.5 kJ mol -1 , resulting in Δ E ct = 80.7 kJ mol -1 . For water, Δ E Me - solv = −5 kJ/mol has been estimated . Differences in TU electrodesorption peak energies (Table ) from Ag(111) ( E C1 = −1.21 V) and Au(111) substrates ( E C1 = −0.83 V) 33 are Δ E C1 = −0.38 V = 36.7 kJ mol -1 in a single-electron charge-transfer process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reductive electrodesorption of different alkanethiolates from the substrate Me in a given solvent the terms Δ E des , Δε HOMO , and Δ E S - s cancel. Therefore, the energy difference (Δ = ) for this process is given by the n- dependent terms Note that we can neglect the n- dependent long-ranged adsorbate−substrate interactions at physisorbed micelles 20 because they are not formed in methanolic solutions . Therefore, for a given substrate, the shift in the E p value with n should reflect mainly Δ E A - s and Δ E A - A contributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though we used a mixture of 95% methanol and 5% water as electrolyte, rather than pure methanol, the adsorption energy of methanol is greater than the adsorption energy of water on these surfaces. Therefore, the use of the adsorption energy corresponding to methanol seems to be justified . To calculate E des for the alkanethiolate−copper(111) system, we have used E des = yE des , fcc + xE des,bridge (Table ) where x = 0.21 and y = 0.79 according to the site occupancy reported for methanethiolate adsorption on copper .…”
Section: Quantum Density Functional Theory (Dft) Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%