2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1024478415121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 in the indicated limits 0 < ℎ ≤ ≤ 10 10 m −1 . For this purpose, let us apply the correlation analysis [35,38]. Doing in such a way and applying the least squares method in the interval 10 −5 m −1 ≤ ℎ ≤ 10 10 m −1 , we obtain the regression equation lg( (ℎ )) = lg(ℎ ) + .…”
Section: Self-similar Fragmentation Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 in the indicated limits 0 < ℎ ≤ ≤ 10 10 m −1 . For this purpose, let us apply the correlation analysis [35,38]. Doing in such a way and applying the least squares method in the interval 10 −5 m −1 ≤ ℎ ≤ 10 10 m −1 , we obtain the regression equation lg( (ℎ )) = lg(ℎ ) + .…”
Section: Self-similar Fragmentation Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting solutions of PhF and SF C = 1×10 -3 mol/L were prepared on the day of the experiment by dissolving the sample in 25 ml of twice-distilled water with addition of several drops of concentrated NaOH solution. Initial alcoholic solutions of o-NPhF, DSPhF and NF were prepared according to recommendations [12]: 1 ml HCl (6 mol/L) and 80-85 ml of 96% ethanol were added to the sample of dye and carefully heated until …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%