Supplemental Information 3: Cranial and Dental Measuring Distances
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27618/supp-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Systematic relationships of cervids have been controversial for decades. Despite new input from molecular systematics, consensus could only be partially reached. The initial, gross (sub)classification based on morphology and comparative anatomy was mostly supported by molecular data. The rich fossil record of cervids has never been extensively tested in phylogenetic frameworks concerning potential systematic relationships of fossil cervids to extant cervids. The aim of this work was to investigate the systemat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 115 publications
(326 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?