Untitled

Kafle, Ved P.; Pack, Sangheon; Choi, Yanghee; Kamioka, Eiji; Yamada, Shigeki

doi:10.1002/wcm.v7:5

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This network congestion can severely increase delay and packet loss and cut the network throughput. Congestion control refers to techniques that can keep away from congestion before it happens or recovery after it happens (Lochert et al, 2007;Kumaran and Sankaranarayanan, 2011a).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main aim of congestion control is to lower the EndtoEnd delay and reduced packet lost caused by network congestion and offer better performance of the network (Lochert et al, 2007;Tran and Raghavendra, 2006;Kumaran and Sankaranarayanan, 2011b). In wire line networks, congestion control is employed at the transport layer and it is independent from the functionality of other layers (Lochert et al, 2007;Tran and Raghavendra, 2006;Yu and Giannakis, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In wire line networks, congestion control is employed at the transport layer and it is independent from the functionality of other layers (Lochert et al, 2007;Tran and Raghavendra, 2006;Yu and Giannakis, 2008). However, these congestion control techniques do not apply directly to ad hoc networks, because the ad hoc network is challenged by a limited wireless bandwidth, power constraints and route failures, due to node mobility and limited buffer size.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Lochert et al, 2007;Tran and Raghavendra, 2006). The exsisting congestion control techniques cannot directly used in an adhoc network because in an adhoc network, it is more expensive, in terms of time and overhead and removes congestion after it happened (Lochert et al, 2007;Tran and Raghavendra, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Congestion Free Routing in Adhoc Networks

O.¹

2012

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problem statement:A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a temporary network; the mobile devices in an ad-hoc network are communicating through wireless links without any pre-existing infrastructure. The one major problem of this network is network congestion, it may take place at any intermediate nodes when data packets are traveling from source to destination. The major problems of congestion or high data loss, increasing End to End and retransmission packets which affects the overall network performance. The main goal of congestion control is to effectively utilize the existing network resources and maintain the network load below the capacity. Approach: This study presents the Congestion Free Routing in Adhoc networks (CFR), based on dynamically estimated mechanism to monitor network congestion by calculating the average queue length at the node level. While using the average queue length, the nodes' congestion status divided into the three zones (safe zone, likely to be congested zone and congested zone). CFR utilizes the non-congested neighbors and initiates route discovery mechanism to discover a congestion free route between source and destination. This path becomes a core path between source and destination. To maintain the congestion free status, the nodes which are helping data packet transmission periodically calculate their congestion status at the node level. When a core node is noticed that it fell in to likely to congested zone and alerts to its neighbors. The predecessor core path node is aware of this situation and initiates an alternate path discovery mechanism to a destination. Finally it discovers a new congestion free route to the destination. Results: The assessment between CFR and AODV was conducted by using the Ns-2 simulator. The simulation results confirmed that the CFR improved packet delivery ratio, reduction of End to End delay and control packets. Conclusion: Our proposed technique solved the congestion problems in a network.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%