Untitled

Macias, Cathaleene; Propst, Rudyard N.; Rodican, Charles F.; Boyd, Jeremy

doi:10.1023/a:1011523615374

Cited by 20 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are two measures of clubhouse fidelity described in the literature: the Clubhouse Fidelity Index (CFI) (Lucca 2000 ) and the Clubhouse Research and Evaluation Screening Survey (CRESS) (Macias et al 2001 ). The Clubhouse Research and Evaluation Screening Survey (CRESS) is a brief instrument designed to measure operational fidelity and predict clubhouse readiness for accreditation and performance in model outcomes (Macias et al 2001 ).…”

Section: Clubhouse Affiliation Accreditation and Standardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… * Nine articles provide evidence in multiple domains # Supportive a Beard et al ( 1963 , 1978 ), Booth ( 1994 ), Crowther et al ( 2010 ), Grinspan ( 2015 ), Henry et al ( 1999 ) b Baker (2012), Barry ( 1982 ), Beckel ( 1998 ), Donnell ( 2001 ), Gold et al ( 2016 ), Hancock et al ( 2015 ), Johnsen et al ( 2004 ), Macias et al ( 2001a , b ), Macias et al ( 2006 ), Schonebaum et al ( 2006 ), Schonebaum and Boyd ( 2012 ), Stein et al ( 1999 ), Tsang et al ( 2010 ), Yau et al ( 2005 ) c Boyd and Bentley ( 2005 ), Gold et al ( 2016 ); Jacobs ( 1999 ), Jung and Kim ( 2012 ), Mowbray et al ( 2009 ), Warner et al ( 1999 ) d Adler ( 1976 ), Biegel et al ( 2013a , b ), Booth ( 1994 ), Carolan et al ( 2011 ), Mowbray et al ( 2005 ), Spence ( 2014 ), Warner et al ( 1999 ) e Pelletier et al ( 2005 ) …”

Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…b Baker (2012), Barry ( 1982 ), Beckel ( 1998 ), Donnell ( 2001 ), Gold et al ( 2016 ), Hancock et al ( 2015 ), Johnsen et al ( 2004 ), Macias et al ( 2001a , b ), Macias et al ( 2006 ), Schonebaum et al ( 2006 ), Schonebaum and Boyd ( 2012 ), Stein et al ( 1999 ), Tsang et al ( 2010 ), Yau et al ( 2005 )…”

Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation

McKay

Nugent

Johnsen

et al. 2016

Adm Policy Ment Health

127

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Clubhouse Model has been in existence for over sixty-five years; however, a review that synthesizes the literature on the model is needed. The current study makes use of the existing research to conduct a systematic review of articles providing a comprehensive understanding of what is known about the Clubhouse Model, to identify the best evidence available, as well as areas that would benefit from further study. Findings are summarized and evidence is classified by outcome domains. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria of Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT’s), quasi-experimental studies, or observational studies for domains of employment (N = 29); quality of life/satisfaction (N = 10); reductions in psychiatric hospitalization(s) (N = 10); social relationships (N = 10); education (N = 3); and health promotion activities (N = 2). RCT results support the efficacy of the Clubhouse Model in promoting employment, reducing hospitalization(s), and improving quality of life. Quasi-experimental and observational studies offer support in education and social domains. The findings from this review indicate that Clubhouses are a promising practice but additional studies using rigorous methods that report the strength of the outcomes are needed to evaluate Clubhouse programs with fidelity to the Clubhouse Model.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Clubhouse Affiliation Accreditation and Standardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation

McKay

Nugent

Johnsen

et al. 2016

Adm Policy Ment Health

127

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clubhouses help members seeking employment with their job search and career development by identifying transitional, supported, and independent employment as described elsewhere [ 1 ]. Staff develop and maintain relationships with employers to secure positions for members, provide member job training and support, and send a Clubhouse staff or alternate member in the event of an absence [ 1 , 58 , 59 ]. This “absence coverage” incentivizes nearby employers to participate in Clubhouse employment programs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging U.S. Adults with Serious Mental Illness in Participatory Design Research Exercises

Rollings

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clubhouses are non-clinical, community-based centers for adult members with serious mental illness. The evidence-based model assists adults with identifying employment, housing, education, and social opportunities; wellness and health-promoting activities; reducing hospitalizations and criminal justice system involvement; and improving social relationships, satisfaction, and quality of life. The model enables member participation in all Clubhouse operations, yet offers little guidance concerning facility design and member engagement in the design process. This case study explored the use of participatory design research exercises to (1) document member needs, preferences, and priorities to inform the design of a new midwestern U.S. Clubhouse facility and (2) meaningfully engage members (n = 16) in the design process. Four participatory design research exercises were developed, administered, and analyzed. Results revealed aesthetics and ambience; safety and security; ease of use and maintenance; adaptability, flexibility, and accessibility; and transportation as future priorities. Space and furnishing needs and priorities were also identified. Informal observations and participant feedback suggested that the participatory exercises meaningfully engaged members in a manner aligned with Clubhouse Model principles by centering member dignity, strengths, and work-oriented expectations. Future directions for research on Clubhouse design and member engagement in the design process are also discussed.

show abstract

Fidelity of Implementation of Research‐Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses

Borrego

Cutler

Prince

et al. 2013

J of Engineering Edu

125

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Increasing attention is being paid to improvement in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education through increased adoption of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS), but high-quality measures of faculty instructional practice do not exist to monitor progress.Purpose/Hypothesis The measure of how well an implemented intervention follows the original is called fidelity of implementation. This theory was used to address the research questions: What is the fidelity of implementation of selected RBIS in engineering science courses? That is, how closely does engineering science classroom practice reflect the intentions of the original developers? Do the critical components that characterize an RBIS discriminate between engineering science faculty members who claimed use of the RBIS and those who did not?Design/Method A survey of 387 U.S. faculty teaching engineering science courses (e.g., statics, circuits, thermodynamics) included questions about class time spent on 16 critical components and use of 11 corresponding RBIS. Fidelity was quantified as the percentage of RBIS users who also spent time on corresponding critical components. Discrimination between users and nonusers was tested using chi square.Results Overall fidelity of the 11 RBIS ranged from 11% to 80% of users spending time on all required components. Fidelity was highest for RBIS with one required component: casebased teaching, just-in-time teaching, and inquiry learning. Thirteen of 16 critical components discriminated between users and nonusers for all RBIS to which they were mapped.Conclusions Results were consistent with initial mapping of critical components to RBIS. Fidelity of implementation is a potentially useful framework for future work in STEM undergraduate education.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 20 publications

References 29 publications

A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation

A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation

Engaging U.S. Adults with Serious Mental Illness in Participatory Design Research Exercises

Fidelity of Implementation of Research‐Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About