2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1019978531869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This study estimated the effect of Medicare supplemental insurance plans on Medicare expenditures, controlling for unobserved selection. For employer-sponsored policies, there was significant unobserved favorable selection into plans with and without prescription drug coverage. For individual plans, there was unobserved adverse selection into plans with drug benefits and unobserved favorable selection into plans without. Individual supplemental plans without prescription drugs increased Medicare expenditures b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important of these additional benefits are reduced cost-sharing for outpatient medical care and coverage for outpatient prescription drugs. These benefits also have been available from Medicare supplement insurance policies (also known as Medigap), but when purchased without the assistance of a former employer these policies are substantially more expensive than coverage through Medicare HMOs (Atherly 2002). Detractors argue that Medicare HMOs attract disproportionately healthy enrollees and therefore are overpaid, increasing costs to the government compared with providing the same coverage through traditional Medicare (Mello et al 2003;Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important of these additional benefits are reduced cost-sharing for outpatient medical care and coverage for outpatient prescription drugs. These benefits also have been available from Medicare supplement insurance policies (also known as Medigap), but when purchased without the assistance of a former employer these policies are substantially more expensive than coverage through Medicare HMOs (Atherly 2002). Detractors argue that Medicare HMOs attract disproportionately healthy enrollees and therefore are overpaid, increasing costs to the government compared with providing the same coverage through traditional Medicare (Mello et al 2003;Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%