Untitled

Reynolds, Cecil R.; Richmond, Bert O.

doi:10.1023/a:1025751206600

Cited by 677 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The total score, which is a sum of symptoms of physiological anxiety, worry, and concentration difficulties, was used. This measure was cross-validated with multiple groups by predicting scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (Reynolds and Richmond 1997). In the current study, this scale had good reliability (α=0.84; α AA =0.83, α C =0.86, W=1.21, p=0.09).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Predictive Value of Informant Discrepancies in Reports of Parenting: Relations to Early Adolescents’ Adjustment

Guion

Mrug

Windle

2008

J Abnorm Child Psychol

160

206

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research has demonstrated a lack of agreement between parent and child reports across a range of parent and child variables. These discrepancies hinder the interpretation of research findings as well as diagnostic and treatment decisions in clinical practice. The current study examined the hypothesis that discrepancies between parent and child reports of parenting can be useful as predictors of future child outcomes. The participants included 559 early adolescents and their primary caregivers (79% African American, 21% Caucasian). Both respondents provided information on parental nurturance, harsh discipline and inconsistent discipline. A year later, information of adolescents' internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and social competence was collected. Structural equation modeling revealed that parent-child discrepancies in parenting reports could be explained by a latent factor which was a significant predictor of child internalizing problems and social competence, but not of externalizing problems, after adjusting for initial internalizing and externalizing problems. The three models applied across gender and ethnicity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

“…Anxiety Children completed the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS; Reynolds and Richmond 1997). This scale includes 37 true/false items assessing the current feelings and behaviors of the respondent.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Value of Informant Discrepancies in Reports of Parenting: Relations to Early Adolescents’ Adjustment

Guion

Mrug

Windle

2008

J Abnorm Child Psychol

160

206

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Anxiety was assessed via the twins' self-reports using an abbreviated version (10 items) of the Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (CMAS; Reynolds & Richmond, 1978, 1997. The CMAS is a widely used instrument that evaluates physiological, emotional, and cognitive symptoms of anxiety in youth from 6 to 19 years of age and has shown good reliability and validity in previous studies (Kendall & Suveg, 2006).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dark Side of Friends: A Genetically Informed Study of Victimization Within Early Adolescents’ Friendships

Brendgen

Girard

Vitaro

et al. 2014

Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a genetically informed twin design, this study examined (a) whether, in line with gene-environment correlation (rGE), a genetic disposition for anxiety puts children at risk of being victimized by a close friend or by other peers, and (b) whether, in line with gene-environment interaction (GxE), victimization by a close friend or by other peers moderates the expression of a genetic disposition for anxiety. Participants were 268 monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs (MZ males = 71, MZ females = 80, DZ males = 56, DZ females = 61; 87% of European descent) assessed via questionnaires in Grade 8 (M age = 14.06 years, SD = 3.60). Participants reported about their victimization by a close friend and by other peers and their anxiety level. Victimization by a close friend and victimization by other peers were uncorrelated. In line with rGE, genetic factors related to anxiety predicted victimization by other peers, whereas victimization by a close friend was not predicted by heritable characteristics. Moreover, in line with a suppression process of GxE, victimization by other peers reduced the role of genetic factors in explaining interindividual differences in anxiety. In contrast, in line with a diathesis-stress process of GxE, victimization by a close friend fostered the expression of a genetic disposition for anxiety. Victimization by a close friend seems to happen to adolescents regardless of their personal, heritable characteristics. If it does occur, however, it is a source of distress mostly for youth with a genetic vulnerability for anxiety.

show abstract

“…50,51 Scoring is on a 4-point Likert scale and higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety. 50,51 The internal reliability is good (Cronbach's alpha < 0.80).…”

Section: Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive–behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy versus brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depression (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial

Goodyer

Reynolds

Barrett

et al. 2017

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAlthough there are effective psychological treatments for unipolar major depression in adolescents, whether or not one or more of the available therapies maintain reduced depressive symptoms 1 year after the end of treatment is not known. This is a non-trivial issue because maintaining lowered depressive symptoms below a clinical threshold level reduces the risk for diagnostic relapse into the adult years.ObjectiveTo determine whether or not either of two specialist psychological treatments, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) or short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy (STPP), is more effective than a reference brief psychosocial intervention (BPI) in maintaining reduction of depression symptoms in the year after treatment.DesignObserver-blind, parallel-group, pragmatic superiority randomised controlled trial.SettingA total of 15 outpatient NHS clinics in the UK from East Anglia, north-west England and North London.ParticipantsAdolescents aged 11–17 years withDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition major depression including those with suicidality, depressive psychosis and conduct disorder. Patients were randomised using stochastic minimisation controlling for age, sex and self-reported depression sum score; 470 patients were randomised and 465 were included in the analyses.InterventionsIn total, 154 adolescents received CBT, 156 received STPP and 155 received BPI. The trial lasted 86 weeks and study treatments were delivered in the first 36 weeks, with 52 weeks of follow-up.Main outcome measuresMean sum score on self-reported depressive symptoms (primary outcome) at final study assessment (nominally 86 weeks, at least 52 weeks after end of treatment). Secondary measures were change in mean sum scores on self-reported anxiety symptoms and researcher-rated Health of the Nation scales for children and adolescents measuring psychosocial function. Following baseline assessment, there were a further five planned follow-up reassessments at nominal time points of 6, 12, 52 and 86 weeks post randomisation.ResultsThere were non-inferiority effects of CBT compared with STPP [treatment effect by final follow-up = –0.578, 95% confidence interval (CI) –2.948 to 4.104;p = 0.748]. There were no superiority effects for the two specialist treatments (CBT + STPP) compared with BPI (treatment effect by final follow-up = –1.898, 95% CI –4.922 to 1.126;p = 0.219). At final assessment there was no significant difference in the mean depressive symptom score between treatment groups. There was an average 49–52% reduction in depression symptoms by the end of the study. There were no differences in total costs or quality-of-life scores between treatment groups and prescribing a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) during treatment or follow-up did not differ between the therapy arms and, therefore, did not mediate the outcome.ConclusionsThe three psychological treatments differed markedly in theoretical and clinical approach and are associated with a similar degree of clinical improvement, cost-effectiveness and subsequent maintenance of lowered depressive symptoms. Both STPP and BPI offer an additional patient treatment choice, alongside CBT, for depressed adolescents attending specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Further research should focus on psychological mechanisms that are associated with treatment response, the maintenance of positive effects, determinants of non-response and whether or not brief psychotherapies are of use in primary care and community settings.LimitationsNeither reason for SSRI prescribing or monitoring of medication compliance was controlled for over the course of the study, and the economic results were limited by missing data.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN83033550.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Heath Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 12. See the National Institute for Heath Research Journals Library website for further project information. Funding was also provided by the Department of Health. The funders had no role in the study design, patient recruitment, data collection, analysis or writing of the study, any aspect pertinent to the study or the decision to submit toThe Lancet.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 677 publications

References 10 publications

Predictive Value of Informant Discrepancies in Reports of Parenting: Relations to Early Adolescents’ Adjustment

Predictive Value of Informant Discrepancies in Reports of Parenting: Relations to Early Adolescents’ Adjustment

The Dark Side of Friends: A Genetically Informed Study of Victimization Within Early Adolescents’ Friendships

Cognitive–behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy versus brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depression (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About