2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011076110317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Varying the volume of solution injected, while keeping the dosage the same, does not cause significant changes in the amount and distribution of drug in the tumor. A higher vascular exchange area leads to higher concentrations of drug in the tumor. Lymphatic drainage in the tumor causes negligible reductions in the mean concentrations in all three different zones. Cellular metabolism and DNA binding kinetics decrease the mean concentrations of drug by about 15 to 40%, as compared to the baseline case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, time-varying plasma drug concentrations can be readily simulated. The baseline plasma drug concentration was set to d 0  = 2.13 mol/m 3 , as commonly used for doxorubicin [52]. In our simulation, the concentration of drug in the tumor interstitium was influenced by the pressure difference within capillary blood and extracellular space, as well as vessel mass exchange surface per unit volume (as determined by vessel diameter and/or age).…”
Section: Computational Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, time-varying plasma drug concentrations can be readily simulated. The baseline plasma drug concentration was set to d 0  = 2.13 mol/m 3 , as commonly used for doxorubicin [52]. In our simulation, the concentration of drug in the tumor interstitium was influenced by the pressure difference within capillary blood and extracellular space, as well as vessel mass exchange surface per unit volume (as determined by vessel diameter and/or age).…”
Section: Computational Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were not of CED, but rather of polymeric drug delivery. The intravascular delivery of a drug for hepatoma and subsequent distribution in the tumor was studied in [19]. All these as well as recent studies ([23], [22], but these were subsequent to our early reports referenced in the Introduction) have all used finite element methods.…”
Section: Interstitial Transport Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The osmotic pressure contribution for the lymph vessels is neglected due to the highly permeable lymphatics. Also, the pressure inside the lymphatics is taken to be 0 mm Hg [49]. By substituting Darcy’s law and Starling’s law into the continuity equation, we obtain the equation for IFP in a solid tumor: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%