2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010602026579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common approach to understanding the delivery of Fe-bearing dust to phytoplankton has been to quantify the solubility of Fe from dust and assume all soluble Fe is also bioavailable, i.e., the amount available for uptake and utilization by living cells [e.g., Özsoy and Saydam, 2001]. However, a major difficulty in assessing the bioavailability of Fe in dust is the lack of consistency in the definition of soluble or bioavailable Fe fractions, making intercomparisons of Fe solubility difficult [Baker and Croot, 2010;Schroth et al, 2009].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach to understanding the delivery of Fe-bearing dust to phytoplankton has been to quantify the solubility of Fe from dust and assume all soluble Fe is also bioavailable, i.e., the amount available for uptake and utilization by living cells [e.g., Özsoy and Saydam, 2001]. However, a major difficulty in assessing the bioavailability of Fe in dust is the lack of consistency in the definition of soluble or bioavailable Fe fractions, making intercomparisons of Fe solubility difficult [Baker and Croot, 2010;Schroth et al, 2009].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ö zsoy and Saydam 110 showed that iron solubility in acid rain moving over Europe and the Mediterranean Sea is ∼56.7% (average pH 4.4), whereas it reaches only 3.32% in red rain (average pH 6.6) originating, according to back-trajectories, in North African mineral dust source zones. Both observed solubilities are governed by the pH dependence and nature of the particles, which act on pH and on the solid-state speciation of iron.…”
Section: Kinetics Of Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that use filters with membrane pores between 0.4 and 0.5 µm in diameter measure the dissolved plus the colloidal iron. 26,28,78,110,120,142 These measurements correspond to "filtered iron", defined as iron filt ) dissolved iron + colloidal iron. The studies using "ultrafiltration" 35 in addition to a membrane pore diameter of ∼0.025 µm 143 are assumed to measure dissolved iron only.…”
Section: Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of iron oxidation states in cloud and fog water demonstrate that the ratio Fe(II) to total dissolved Fe can vary considerably between cloud or fog events (0.02-100%) with typical values superior to 50% [1,4,6,16,17]. The distribution of dissolved iron between the two oxidation states is a complex function of sunlight intensity, concentrations of oxidants (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This FZ method is well adapted to measure the Fe(II) content of wet aerosols or atmospheric waters due to its high sensitivity, high selectivity, and operational lightness in comparison with the other available techniques used for Fe(III) determination in atmospheric waters [5,11,16,17,21]. Compared with other highly sensitive methods using FZ, this quasi-on-line separation does not allow any change in iron redox state and enables the measurement of both Fe(II) and Fe(III).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%