“…The upper bound of x reported here is slightly higher than that reported for chernobylite in real LFCM (x ¼ 0.05-0.10). 25,26 The abundance of U in Zr 1Àx U x SiO 4 has also been reported in simulant Fukushima molten core-concrete interaction (MCCI) products, at a higher value of x than chernobylite (x ¼ 0.19- 0.27). This discrepancy is likely a result of the slower cooling time for real LFCM, which allows for thermodynamic equilibration of U during Zr 1Àx U x SiO 4 formation.…”
Section: Lfcm Mineral Phase Identication and Stoichiometry Analysismentioning
Detailed chemical analysis of the solidified molten fuel still residing in the stricken Chernobyl reactor unit 4 are inferred using multi-modal micro-focus x-ray analysis of a low-radioactivity proxy. A fascinating...
“…The upper bound of x reported here is slightly higher than that reported for chernobylite in real LFCM (x ¼ 0.05-0.10). 25,26 The abundance of U in Zr 1Àx U x SiO 4 has also been reported in simulant Fukushima molten core-concrete interaction (MCCI) products, at a higher value of x than chernobylite (x ¼ 0.19- 0.27). This discrepancy is likely a result of the slower cooling time for real LFCM, which allows for thermodynamic equilibration of U during Zr 1Àx U x SiO 4 formation.…”
Section: Lfcm Mineral Phase Identication and Stoichiometry Analysismentioning
Detailed chemical analysis of the solidified molten fuel still residing in the stricken Chernobyl reactor unit 4 are inferred using multi-modal micro-focus x-ray analysis of a low-radioactivity proxy. A fascinating...
“…Measurements performed at pH ≤ 12 did not allow the identification of aqueous plutonium species. This observation could be explained by silicate ions protonation, considering HSiO 3 -/SiO The comparison with aqueous plutonium oxo-hydroxo colloids solution allowed to observe that the as-obtained plutonium species did not correspond to hydrolyzed plutonium (Figure 2) nor to the plutonium silicate complex, PuOSi(OH) 3 3+ , reported by Pazukhin et al 6 and Yusov et al 5 but might correspond to aqueous plutonium silicate species, such as Pu(SiO 3 ) n (4-2n)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Even if the formation of plutonium silicate complexes and solid plutonium silicate species (or that of other actinide or surrogate elements) has been reported, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] plutonium (IV) chemistry in silicate environment remains poorly understood. Among them, Pu(OSi(OH) 3 ) 3+ was prepared between pH 0.3 and 1.4 in diluted aqueous plutonium and silicate solution and a log(β°) = 11.8 (1) value was evaluated according to equation (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pazukhin et al 6 observed that the titration of Pu(IV) in nitric solution by a aqueous sodium metasilicate solution did not lead to the precipitation of plutonium hydroxide up to pH = 12 while its precipitation occurred at pH = 2 -4 for a titration performed with NaOH or NH 4 OH without metasilicate. They attributed these results to the formation of a plutonium silicate complex with a [Pu(IV)]:[Na 2 SiO 3 ] = 1:8 mole ratio.…”
Studying the speciation of Pu(IV) in very alkaline and silicate ions rich reactive media allowed identifying the formation of plutonium (IV)-silicate colloidal suspensions which were stable for months. These colloids...
“…17 According to the literature, Pu(III) and Pu(VI) silicate species have been reported. [23][24][25][26][27][28] It is also the case for plutonium(IV) silicate aqueous species [29][30][31] , especially for Pu(OSi(OH) 3 ) 3+ .…”
This study reports an innovative way of synthesis of PuSiO4 by hydrothermal in situ oxidation of solid Pu(iii) silicate precursors. It also identifies how representative Th-, U- and Ce-surrogates are of Pu chemistry in silicate ions rich media.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.