1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022830114772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Violence The extent to which participants found using sexual and physical violence toward an intimate partner acceptable was measured by gender-appropriate scales of the Attitudes toward Dating Violence Scales by Price and Byers (1999). This means that participants were asked about the acceptance of sexual and physical violence toward an intimate partner by a person of their gender.…”
Section: Attitudes Toward Sexual and Physical Intimate Partnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Violence The extent to which participants found using sexual and physical violence toward an intimate partner acceptable was measured by gender-appropriate scales of the Attitudes toward Dating Violence Scales by Price and Byers (1999). This means that participants were asked about the acceptance of sexual and physical violence toward an intimate partner by a person of their gender.…”
Section: Attitudes Toward Sexual and Physical Intimate Partnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, positive attitudes toward DV have been empirically related to DV perpetration (e.g., Archer & Graham-Kevan, 2003;Nabors et al, 2006;Price et al, 1999). However, the relationships among DVsupportive attitudes and gender have been equivocal, with some research finding no gender differences in acceptance of DV beliefs (e.g., Archer & Haigh, 1997), and other research suggesting that men are more likely than women to hold DV-supportive attitudes and beliefs (Archer & GrahamKevan, 2003;Bryant & Spencer, 2003;Nabors et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instrument is designed to fill a gap in literature on the evaluation of such attitudes. It stands apart from others as it evaluates attitudes in general by differentiating the type of violence with special attention to psychological and physical violence, without taking into consideration the gender of the perpetrator (for example, the scales developed by Price et al, 1999 differentiate between type of violence and gender of the perpetrator). The IPVAS was created by Smith et al (2005) and validated in a sample of 333 American-Mexican university students.…”
Section: El Efecto De La Redacción De Los íTems En La Medición De Lasmentioning
confidence: 99%