2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1019711617120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: As health plans assume financial risk for providing health care services, effectively managing the health of a population remains one of the toughest challenges. This article shows how risk assessment methods can be used to measure disease burden in the full population and to discriminate levels of future health care needs within specific disease cohorts. We also examine and compare the predictive power of claims-based models within a diabetic cohort.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a sensitivity analysis (results shown in Appendix), we also used random effect analyses (STATA xtreg, re option), clustered at the patient level, adjusting for the patient’s age, gender, race/ethnicity, neighborhood socio-economic status (SES), baseline DxCG risk score 20 (with interaction by Medicare insurance status), medical center, seasonality (calendar month), and medical center specific secular trend. We also repeated all the analyses only among the subset of continuously-enrolled patients (results shown in appendix).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a sensitivity analysis (results shown in Appendix), we also used random effect analyses (STATA xtreg, re option), clustered at the patient level, adjusting for the patient’s age, gender, race/ethnicity, neighborhood socio-economic status (SES), baseline DxCG risk score 20 (with interaction by Medicare insurance status), medical center, seasonality (calendar month), and medical center specific secular trend. We also repeated all the analyses only among the subset of continuously-enrolled patients (results shown in appendix).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DxCG and the closely-related Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-HCC models have performed well in predicting costs in a variety of populations, 18-24 with DxCG-HCC model being commonly used by private insurers and the CMS-HCC model being used to risk-adjust Medicare capitated payments since 2004. 1,6,25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in our previous publication,35,36 individuals who initiated (a 90-day medication gap) duloxetine or pregabalin in 2006 were first identified. All selected patients were required to: have at least one fibromyalgia diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 729.1) during the 12-month pre-index period, be aged between 18 and 64 years as of the index date, have 12-month continuous enrollment in the pre-index and post-index periods, and have 31+ total duloxetine or pregabalin supply days over the entire 12-month post-index period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the previous study,35,36 propensity score stratification was applied to construct duloxetine and pregabalin cohorts with similar demographics, health plan types, geographic regions, comorbid medical conditions, prior health care costs, and prior select medication history (ie, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sleep and antianxiety medications, skeletal muscle relaxants, dopamine agonists, topical agents, and 5-HT 3 antagonists). A logistic regression predicting the probability of initiating duloxetine versus pregabalin was estimated first.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation