“…Particularly, IAL can bring along more accurate results than conventional approaches where features are imported to training by batch. For example, based on UCI datasets, classification errors of Diabetes, Thyroid and Glass derived by ILIA [4] and ITID [1], two neural IAL algorithms, reduced by 8.2%, 14.6% and 12.6%, respectively [1,2]; moreover, based on OIGA, testing error rates derived by IGA of Yeast, Glass and Wine declined by 25.9%, 19.4% and 10.8% [5] in classification. Furthermore, i + Learning and i + LRA, two kinds of IAL decision trees, were employed to run 16 different UCI datasets.…”