1992
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/25/24/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The ground state binding energy of two interacting charged particles, confirmed in a two-dimensional quantum disc by an infinite square well potential, is calculated within the framework of the variational method as a function of the disc radius. The results are discussed in relation with the two limit cases R to infinity and R to phi .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron is squeezed in smaller diameter than in latter cases. From the graphs, the weak radial confinement (d ≥ 3nm) and strong axial confinement case indicate that the electronic energy tends to the value of the two dimensional hydrogen donor (E b → 4d) [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron is squeezed in smaller diameter than in latter cases. From the graphs, the weak radial confinement (d ≥ 3nm) and strong axial confinement case indicate that the electronic energy tends to the value of the two dimensional hydrogen donor (E b → 4d) [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the exciton binding energy increases. When a/b tends to 1, the exciton binding energy tends to 4 R * which corresponds to the well-known two-dimensional exciton binding energy [24,25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Sij = Jcn ~$:C$~dq is the overlap matrix of the functions q5;, performed in the region C, only. Now, we order the eigenvalues of G, so that u i 5 Hermitian, but we can make it Hermitian by taking Thus, we have two different approximations: The first one, henceforth called Al, in which we solve Eqs. (2.5) and (2.9), corresponds to a particular rotation and projection in a model space, leaving unchanged the orthogonalization conditions for the basis-set functions.…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%