2010
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2009.2039827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.6-V Zero-IF/Low-IF Receiver With Integrated Fractional-N Synthesizer for 2.4-GHz ISM-Band Applications

Abstract: Supply voltage reduction with process scaling has made the design of analog, RF and mixed mode circuits increasingly difficult. In this paper, we present the design of an ultra-low voltage, low power and highly integrated dual-mode receiver for 2.4-GHz ISM-band applications. The receiver operates reliably from 0.55-0.65 V and is compatible with commercial standards such as Bluetooth and ZigBee. We discuss the design challenges at low voltage supplies such as limited f T for transistors and higher nonlinearitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.17b). The chip summary and performance benchmarks are given in Table 3.2, where [7,8] are current-reuse architectures, [23] is a classical architecture with cascade of building blocks, and [5] is an ultra-low-voltage design. For this work, the results measured under a 10-GHz on-chip VCO are also included for completeness, but they are more sensitive to test uncertainties.…”
Section: Vco Dividers and Lo Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.17b). The chip summary and performance benchmarks are given in Table 3.2, where [7,8] are current-reuse architectures, [23] is a classical architecture with cascade of building blocks, and [5] is an ultra-low-voltage design. For this work, the results measured under a 10-GHz on-chip VCO are also included for completeness, but they are more sensitive to test uncertainties.…”
Section: Vco Dividers and Lo Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapter 5 compares the proposed solutions in order to converge to optimal designs through assessments of power, non-ideal frequency operation (parasitic poles [12], filters based on CCII and CA are mainly presented, since despite some limitations they have more degrees of freedom for design because gain and bandwidth are independent [26]- [27]. In conclusion, the first-order filters and LC simulation filters are not efficient to be used compare to second order filters so according to Table I which is the comparison between recent published complex filters, research methodology will be presented .…”
Section: Thesis Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2nd-order active-RC Chebyshev complex filter similar to that in [6] is utilized for 30dB image rejection and channel selection. Ultra-low power operational amplifiers with adaptive-biased pole-zero cancellation push-pull sourcefollower are used to realize the active-RC complex filter [7].…”
Section: Front-end and Image Rejection Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%