1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-7007(99)00004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1-D analysis of ejector performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
405
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 876 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
16
405
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the possible ways to reduce these discrepancies is to include friction and others losses that take place within the ejector mixing chamber and ejector diffuser. Further, it is necessary to analyse experimental and numerical 02059-p. 4 results more thoroughly to deeply understand flow processes inside the mixing chamber and include and describe all phenomena to predict the chocking conditions more precisely. Figure 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the possible ways to reduce these discrepancies is to include friction and others losses that take place within the ejector mixing chamber and ejector diffuser. Further, it is necessary to analyse experimental and numerical 02059-p. 4 results more thoroughly to deeply understand flow processes inside the mixing chamber and include and describe all phenomena to predict the chocking conditions more precisely. Figure 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows calculation of ejector efficiency, which is defined as (16) where p 4 is back-pressure, i.e. the pressure at the diffuser exit.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Afterwards, a series of shock waves takes place such that the flow is subsonic at the beginning of the diffuser, where it compresses to outlet conditions. At fixed inlet conditions, two operating regimes can be recognized depending on the value of the outlet pressure P out relative to a certain threshold P lim [10]. For P out < P lim , the secondary mass flow rateṁ sec is choked between the primary jet and the outer wall, such that total mass flow rate is at a maximum and independent of the exit pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For single-phase ejectors, the entrainment ratio is assumed to be a function of the Effective Area, i.e., the annular passage between the motive jet and the Constant Area Section (CAS) walls where the choking of the secondary flow occurs [14]. The pioneering model applying this concept is the one proposed by Huang et al [10], which calculates the double-choke entrainment ratio and CAS diameter of gas ejectors, given the inlet operating conditions and motive nozzle dimensions. The model assumes isentropic perfect gas behavior and divides the ejector in key regions: motive nozzle, secondary inlet, mixture before and after the shock and diffuser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%