2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 12-month lifestyle intervention does not improve cardiac autonomic function in patients with chronic kidney disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 23 29-48 Two studies are secondary analyses. 45,47 Table 1 shows the design characteristics of the included studies. Chronic conditions included cancer (n=5), COPD (n=5), cardiac (n=4), diabetes (n=4), and CKD (n=4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 23 29-48 Two studies are secondary analyses. 45,47 Table 1 shows the design characteristics of the included studies. Chronic conditions included cancer (n=5), COPD (n=5), cardiac (n=4), diabetes (n=4), and CKD (n=4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies with aerobic exercise also indicated improvements in lower body strength and conditioning which may indicate that any level of muscle loading in patients with low physical condition is enough to elicit beneficial change. Other limitations included monitoring patient medication, 47 recruitment, 31 composite endpoints, 39 and rigorous exclusion/inclusion criteria. 38 Intervention design limitations included the under-reporting and lack of detail of the F.I.T.T.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the level of exercise intensity may have different results on cardiac autonomic function. For example, high-intensity endurance training was more effective in improving parasympathetic activity compared to low-intensity endurance training in healthy individuals [ 45 ]. Low HRV is associated with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous outcomes related to cardiovascular risk were analysed. Resting Systolic (SBP) (10 studies, 11 interventions groups, 440 participants) [20,23,24,26,27,32,35,40,44,45] and Diastolic (DBP) Blood Pressure (9 studies, 10 intervention groups, 408 participants) [20,23,24,26,30,32,35,40,45] did not change signi cantly (Supplemental Figures S8A & S8B). Subanalyses removing low-quality studies from pooled analyses continued to show no signi cance (Supplemental Figures S4A & S4B).…”
Section: Cardiovascular Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-analysis of DBP by exercise modality showed a signi cant improvement for aerobic training (Supplemental Table S4). Resting Heart Rate (RHR) analysis (8 studies, 309 participants) [23,29,32,36,40,[44][45][46]] and sub-analyses showed no signi cance (Supplemental Figures S8C & S4C, Table S4). Endothelial function was assessed via Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) (5 studies, 207 participants) [23,26,29,38,44] and the aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) (4 studies, 163 participants)[28, 29,38,44] with analysis and sub-analyses of both revealing no signi cant results (Supplemental Figures S8D & S8E, Table S4).…”
Section: Cardiovascular Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%