1986
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(86)90062-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 13C nuclear magnetic resonance study of the microstructure of poly(vinyl alcohol)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main reasons for the broadening is most probably the accumulation of the less reactive primary C-SC(S)OR 0 terminal originating from the head-to-head addition, which is inherent in the VAc radical polymerization. [44][45][46][47][48] These results suggest that Mn 2 (CO) 10 induces the controlled/living radical polymerization of VAc even in conjunction with a xanthate via the reversible activation of the C-SC(S)OR terminal.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…One of the main reasons for the broadening is most probably the accumulation of the less reactive primary C-SC(S)OR 0 terminal originating from the head-to-head addition, which is inherent in the VAc radical polymerization. [44][45][46][47][48] These results suggest that Mn 2 (CO) 10 induces the controlled/living radical polymerization of VAc even in conjunction with a xanthate via the reversible activation of the C-SC(S)OR terminal.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The minor peaks at 14.1ppm, 21.1ppm, 30.0ppm, 60.3ppm, 177.3 ppm from initiator EBiB were also well resolved in the spectrum. Based on Levy and Nelson' method49, 50 the minor peaks at 24.6 ppm and 27.1 ppm were attributed to the tail‐to‐tail structure (Scheme ), which was about 5.7% of the total repeating units. The signal of the head‐to‐head structure (carbon m, n) at about 75–77 ppm and the ω‐terminal methine carbon with a C‐Br bond (carbon i, ∼76 ppm) were unfortunately overlapped in the solvent CDCl 3 peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 The minor peaks at 14.1ppm, 21.1ppm, 30.0ppm, 60.3ppm, 177.3 ppm from initiator EBiB were also well resolved in the spectrum. Based on Levy and Nelson' method 49,50 the minor peaks at 24.6 ppm and 27.1 ppm were attributed to the tail-to-tail structure (Scheme 2), which was about 5.7% of the total repeating units. The signal of the head-to-head structure (carbon m, n) at about 75-77 ppm and the x-terminal methine carbon with a C-Br bond (carbon i, $76 ppm) were unfortunately overlapped in the solvent CDCl 3 peaks.…”
Section: Nmr Study On the Microstructure Of Pvacmentioning
confidence: 99%