ISSCC. 2005 IEEE International Digest of Technical Papers. Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2005.1493967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1v 433/868MHz 25kb/s-FSK 2kb/s-OOK RF transceiver SoC in standard digital 0.18μm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WPAN transceiver [5] features very low power consumption at the expense of a very high noise figure of 28 dB, which is not acceptable for many applications. Although the system specification of the WiseNET WPAN system is not comparable to IEEE 802.15.4, the receiver implementation exhibits supply currents in the range of 2 mA [6]. This is achieved with high-off-chip inductors for RF port matching and VCO implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WPAN transceiver [5] features very low power consumption at the expense of a very high noise figure of 28 dB, which is not acceptable for many applications. Although the system specification of the WiseNET WPAN system is not comparable to IEEE 802.15.4, the receiver implementation exhibits supply currents in the range of 2 mA [6]. This is achieved with high-off-chip inductors for RF port matching and VCO implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many WBAN wireless transceivers work in 433, 868 or 915 MHz, 2.45 GHz license-free industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) frequency band, but with different modulation schemes and different signal bandwidths [20,21]. To design a WBAN hub that supports various medical applications with one single transceiver chip, it is necessary to implement a reconfigurable transceiver compatible with various SID node transceivers.…”
Section: A Multiband Transceiver Front End For Wban Hubsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable sensitivity at the same BER is realized by the Bluetooth front-end from [25] at a higher data rate, however, higher power is again consumed. The FSK narrowband receiver design reported in [26] realizes 20 dB better sensitivity operating in the ISM band around 0.9 GHz, where gain is easier to realize at low current consumption. However, this implementation may be susceptible to interference from nearby commercial cellular bands and other appliances operating in the same (unlicensed) ISM band at 900 MHz.…”
Section: ) Measurement With 2 Fm-uwb Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%