2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-021-00372-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2-dimensional uncertain linguistic MABAC method for multiattribute group decision-making problems

Abstract: The 2-dimensional uncertain linguistic variable (2DULV) can depict decision-makers’ subjective assessments on the reliability of given evaluation results, which is a valid and practical tool to express decision information. In this study, we develop an improved MABAC method with 2DULVs to handle multiattribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems where the weight information of attributes is unknown. First, some related theories of 2DULVs and the basic procedure of the MABAC method are briefly reviewed. Then… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each alternative is evaluated and ranked by specifying the difference between the distances. The MABAC method has the advantages that the computation is simple, the results are stable, and a comprehensive result can be obtained considering the potential amount of gain or loss [36], which is a helpful, reliable tool for MADM [37]. Currently, this method is utilized in MADM problems.…”
Section: Classical Mabac Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each alternative is evaluated and ranked by specifying the difference between the distances. The MABAC method has the advantages that the computation is simple, the results are stable, and a comprehensive result can be obtained considering the potential amount of gain or loss [36], which is a helpful, reliable tool for MADM [37]. Currently, this method is utilized in MADM problems.…”
Section: Classical Mabac Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the distance of evaluation matrix obtained from each decision maker to the border approximation area matrix. Numerous studies based on application of MABAC method to decision making theory are available in the literature (Java et al, 2022;Jiang et al, 2022;Su et al, 2022;Liu and Wang, 2022;Gurmani et al, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining with the interval numbers and the interval distance function, Lo et al proposed I-MDMto detemine the objective weights of uncertain information. In recent years, many scholars have presented some improved MDM decision-making methods, such as TOPSIS Employment quality of college graduates (Lin et al, 2019), MULTIMOORA (Huang et al, 2020), and MABAC (Liu and Wang, 2022),etc. These methods have been applied into many fields, such as the security evaluation of computer system, product demand evaluation and enterprise innovation ability evaluation,etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%