2011
DOI: 10.3336/gm.46.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2-equivalent Kelley continuum

Abstract: Abstract. The main purpose of this paper is to construct a 2-equivalent compactification X of a ray whose remainder is homeomorphic to X and such that X is a Kelley Continuum. In order to construct this example, we prove a theorem which gives conditions for an inverse limit of arcs X to be the compactification of a ray and X is a Kelley continuum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are also grateful to Gerardo Acosta for bringing the Islas work [16] to our attention and to the anonymous referee for bringing to our attention the problem whether constructed continua are Suslinean or not. We are also grateful to Gerardo Acosta for bringing the Islas work [16] to our attention and to the anonymous referee for bringing to our attention the problem whether constructed continua are Suslinean or not.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are also grateful to Gerardo Acosta for bringing the Islas work [16] to our attention and to the anonymous referee for bringing to our attention the problem whether constructed continua are Suslinean or not. We are also grateful to Gerardo Acosta for bringing the Islas work [16] to our attention and to the anonymous referee for bringing to our attention the problem whether constructed continua are Suslinean or not.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth emphasizing, that an interesting example of 2-equivalent continuum was recently constructed by Islas [16], who proved that his example was hereditarily decomposable but without investigating the dynamical properties of it. As we exhibited in the above proof, X f is 3-equivalent.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mention that such operators are called fundamental reducible, see e.g. [47], and that they possess a well-developed spectral and perturbation theory, cf [36,40,43,[47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%