Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2851613.2851845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2-phase frame-based knowledge extraction framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its use of linguistic resources for ontological purposes, FrameBase has significant potential for text mining and other natural language related tasks. Both pure Semantic Role Labelling (SRL) systems for FrameNet such as SEMAFOR [9] as well as text-toontology systems such as FRED [49] and Pikes [7] could be adapted to produce FrameBase data from natural language text. Similar methods could also enable question answering [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its use of linguistic resources for ontological purposes, FrameBase has significant potential for text mining and other natural language related tasks. Both pure Semantic Role Labelling (SRL) systems for FrameNet such as SEMAFOR [9] as well as text-toontology systems such as FRED [49] and Pikes [7] could be adapted to produce FrameBase data from natural language text. Similar methods could also enable question answering [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our approach supports both English and Italian, we adopt two different strategies, given that the NLP tools available for the two languages are very different and generally achieve better performance on English data. For English, we use the PIKES suite (Corcoglioniti et al, 2016): it first launches the Stanford Named Entity Recognizer (Finkel et al, 2005) to identify persons' mentions in the documents (e.g., "J. F. Kennedy, " "Lady Gaga, " etc. ), and then the Stanford Deterministic Coreference Resolution System (Manning et al, 2014) to set coreferential chains within each document.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in case of text analysers automated entering is applied, but the amount of human participation in this process is not clear [18]- [21].…”
Section: B Related Work On Knowledge Frame Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration with other knowledge representation systems is possible, e.g., with product rules and business constraints [31], OWL [17], [21], [31], fuzzy logic [26], and modal logic [29]. …”
Section: B Related Work On Knowledge Frame Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%