2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2-Step Cerebrospinal Algorithm for the Selection of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes

Abstract: IMPORTANCECerebrospinal fluid (CSF) core Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers have shown an excellent capacity for the in vivo detection of AD. Previous studies have shown that CSF levels of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) also correlate with tau pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) after accounting for AD copathology. OBJECTIVETo develop an algorithm based on core AD CSF measures to exclude cases with AD pathology and then differentiate between FTLD-tau and FTLD transactive response DNA-binding prote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While our previous proteomics‐based study analyzed mainly FTLD‐Tau cases with MAPT mutations,12 the current study was performed with a more heterogeneous FTLD‐Tau group including also sporadic CBS and PSP cases, which may explain the observed discrepancies. Indeed, recent studies have highlighted that CSF biomarkers (e.g., pTau) can differ between familial and sporadic FTLD cases that develop the same underlying neuropathology 38, 39. Thus, this data also highlights the impact that the heterogeneity within each FTLD subtype can have on the CSF biomarker profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While our previous proteomics‐based study analyzed mainly FTLD‐Tau cases with MAPT mutations,12 the current study was performed with a more heterogeneous FTLD‐Tau group including also sporadic CBS and PSP cases, which may explain the observed discrepancies. Indeed, recent studies have highlighted that CSF biomarkers (e.g., pTau) can differ between familial and sporadic FTLD cases that develop the same underlying neuropathology 38, 39. Thus, this data also highlights the impact that the heterogeneity within each FTLD subtype can have on the CSF biomarker profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Noteworthy, up to 30% of FTLD cases are misdiagnosed with other disorders, especially AD 55. Several studies have shown that ratios with AD CSF biomarkers (i.e., pTau/A β 42 or tTau/A β 42) can discriminate FTLD from AD with performances over 80% 38, 56. In this study, we identified a model able to discriminate FTLD from a general group of non‐FTLD dementia (AD and DLB) with 91% sensitivity and 84% specificity using pTau, p/tTau ratio and YKL40.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain donation not only allows the confirmation of the diagnosis and the presence of comorbid pathologies but is also necessary to correlate pathological data with CSF or imaging biomarkers [24] and to characterize the underlying biological processes of these biomarkers [25]. Moreover, it is known that secondary pathologies can influence the biomarker signatures [26,27], and it is important to capture them for their correct interpretation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the FTLD‐TAU group included patients with (1) a pathological diagnosis of primary tauopathy (1 progressive supranuclear palsy, 1 corticobasal degeneration) and (2) a pathogenic mutation in microtubule‐associated protein tau gene (MAPT) ( n = 4). In all FTLD cases, the in vivo evidence of AD pathology was gathered using the AD core CSF biomarkers and in‐house calculated cutoff ratios . Specifically, a phosphorylated (p)‐tau/amyloid‐β (Aβ)42 ratio >0.108 (Bologna) or >0.08 (Ulm) was considered supportive for AD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%