2021
DOI: 10.17996/anc.21-00135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2-Year Prospective Study on the Differences in Prognostic Factors for Major Adverse Cardiovascular, Cerebrovascular and Renal Events Between Patients with Mild and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract: Purpose/Method: No studies have reported on prognostic markers in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to the severity of the disease. Therefore, in this multicenter, prospective trial performed as part of the Gunma CKD SPECT Multicenter Study, we recruited 311 patients with CKD (eGFR <60 min/mL/1.73 m 2 ) including 50 patients on hemodialysis and followed them for 2 years. The study sample underwent stress 99m Tctetrofosmin SPECT for suspected or possible ischemic heart disease. We evaluated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al reported that SSS was the best independent predictor for hard cardiac events, whereas SDS was the strongest independent predictor for soft cardiac events [16]. Previously, in patients with chronic kidney disease, SDS was found to be a significant prognostic marker for major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and renal events [17]. Also, higher SSS was linked to lower event-free survival rate [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al reported that SSS was the best independent predictor for hard cardiac events, whereas SDS was the strongest independent predictor for soft cardiac events [16]. Previously, in patients with chronic kidney disease, SDS was found to be a significant prognostic marker for major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and renal events [17]. Also, higher SSS was linked to lower event-free survival rate [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%