2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/739/2/100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 205 μm [N II] MAP OF THE CARINA NEBULA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
83
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
18
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron densities derived from the [N ii] emission, n(e) ∼ 5 to 25 cm −3 , are two to three orders of magnitude higher than that in the disk's warm ionized medium (WIM), but consistent with those found from analysis of [N ii] emission in the Carina nebula, a luminous H ii region with numerous O stars (Oberst et al 2011). This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electron densities derived from the [N ii] emission, n(e) ∼ 5 to 25 cm −3 , are two to three orders of magnitude higher than that in the disk's warm ionized medium (WIM), but consistent with those found from analysis of [N ii] emission in the Carina nebula, a luminous H ii region with numerous O stars (Oberst et al 2011). This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The densities we derive are much larger than those characteristic of the disk's WIM, but are consistent with those derived for very bright nebula with numerous luminous O-type stars. For example, Oberst et al (2011) studied the Carina nebula, which has a very large UV flux, using emission from the [N ii] 205 μm and 122 μm lines along with an excitation model 6 , and find values of n(e) ranging from a few to over 100 cm −3 . In the discussion below we will use the results from our analysis of [N ii] and [C ii] emission to characterize some of the possible energy sources that can maintain such a hot dense ionized plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. For our sources and NGC 2023, the properties of the dense phases fall very near either of the relationships discussed, the dense component of M17 however falls well above even the matter bounded trend given by Oberst et al (2011) by several orders of magnitude, this may be due to the dense clumps being independently gravitationally bound or transient objects -that would therefore have much higher densities than would be expected for pure pressure equilibrium between the clumps and their surroundings. Overall it seems that the simpler sources with a dominant exciting star (e.g., IRAS 23133+6050, S 106, NGC 2023, S 125, S 140) agree well with the trends, while the much more complex sources (e.g., W49A, M17, W3) have much more variance.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…10). Conversely, Oberst et al (2011) suggest that their best fit line represents systems which are density bounded as opposed to the ionization bounded RNe, and hence they found a different relationship. We have also included the H ii region PDR sources from Table 9 while the RNe sources in Table 9 form part of the Young Owl et al (2002) by at least an order of magnitude than predicted by either relationship.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation