2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 24-month follow-up after treatment of hallux rigidus with resection arthroplasty in combination with a resorbable polymer-based implant and platelet-rich plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Of the 8 studies reporting preoperative and postoperative scores by way of an unmodified AOFAS-HMI scale, 6 (75.0%) reported mean improvement in the AOFAS-HMI total score exceeding 30.2 points, with the 2 additional studies reporting mean improvements of 23.0 and 24.6, respectively. 10,15,17,20,27,45,51,55 The validated Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (Pain VAS), and the Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36) were the next most commonly used standardized outcome scoring measures. Of the 4 studies reporting pre and postoperative scores by one of these measures, all reported mean improvements exceeding the MCIDs for their respective scoring systems (MCIDs: FAAM-ADL, 8; FAAM-Sports, 9; Pain VAS, ≥30% difference; FFI-Total, 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 Of the 8 studies reporting preoperative and postoperative scores by way of an unmodified AOFAS-HMI scale, 6 (75.0%) reported mean improvement in the AOFAS-HMI total score exceeding 30.2 points, with the 2 additional studies reporting mean improvements of 23.0 and 24.6, respectively. 10,15,17,20,27,45,51,55 The validated Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (Pain VAS), and the Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36) were the next most commonly used standardized outcome scoring measures. Of the 4 studies reporting pre and postoperative scores by one of these measures, all reported mean improvements exceeding the MCIDs for their respective scoring systems (MCIDs: FAAM-ADL, 8; FAAM-Sports, 9; Pain VAS, ≥30% difference; FFI-Total, 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Many of these studies have surfaced in the literature in recent years, as the movement toward both promoting chondrostimulation and regeneration and developing matrices to serve as functional chondral replacement has gained momentum. [18][19][20][21]27,29,55 Interestingly, studies reporting on opportunities for biopsy of autogenous interposed capsular tissue in the setting of surgery needed on the lesser rays after interposition arthroplasty have noted the appearance of a viable fibrocartilaginous flap in the first MTP joint. 2,43 Despite all of these innovative and promising efforts, only 1 of the studies included in this review evaluated autogenous and allogeneic interpositional material comparatively, noting no difference in failure rate or incidence of transfer metatarsalgia between the placement of autogenous dorsal capsule and acellular dermal matrix allograft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MOCART scoring at a 4 year follow-up showed complete cartilage repair in 20 of 21 patients—demonstrating lasting improvement in PRP therapies applied by PGA-HA implants. PRP-soaked PGA-HA applied to 45 patients with hallus rigidus after 3 stage resection arthroplasty showed clinically significant AOFAS and ROM and radiographical findings showed no anomalies 2 years postoperatively [117]. BMAC delivered by PGA-HA showed clinically significant IKDC score improvement [118].…”
Section: Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biodegradable polyglycolic acid (PGA) has been used as resorbable suture material since the 1970s and is therefore a well-characterized material with excellent biocompatibility. It is already successfully used in the clinic as a scaffold material in articular cartilage defect treatment in knee, talus, and metatarsophalangeal joint with good short-to midterm outcomes (Siclari, Krueger, Endres, & Boux, 2018;Dhollander et al, 2012;Patrascu, Freymann, Kaps, & Poenaru, 2010;Siclari, Mascaro, Kaps, & Boux, 2014). Moreover, due to its biodegradability and approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it is a suitable material for a meniscal implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%