2023
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2023.3240837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 28 GHz 8 × 8 Gapwaveguide Phased Array Employing GaN Front-End With 60 dBm EIRP

Abstract: A high equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) active phased array antenna system has been designed and experimentally verified at the 28 GHz band. The phased array employs Gallium Nitride (GaN) based radio frequency front-ends with 31 dBm output power in transmit mode and 3.5 dB noise figure in receive mode. A fully metallic gapwaveguide technology has been employed in order to achieve an efficient heat dissipation per aperture area of the array as well as low-loss array antenna elements that are easily ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the halves of the array aperture in case of 16×8 FPA determines a larger radiations footprint, namely a worse angular scan resolution of the main beam than clustered-based 16×16 phased arrays. Moreover, this also leads to an almost double power consumption density [39], thus requiring more complicated heat dissipation mechanisms. On the contrary, the 16×8 FPA with the same area of the clustered-based 16×16 phased arrays, achieved with an interelement spacing of 0.72 0, suffers of grating lobes onset due to a PSLL = 0 dB.…”
Section: A Case 1: Maximum Steering Angle Of 0 = 60°mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the halves of the array aperture in case of 16×8 FPA determines a larger radiations footprint, namely a worse angular scan resolution of the main beam than clustered-based 16×16 phased arrays. Moreover, this also leads to an almost double power consumption density [39], thus requiring more complicated heat dissipation mechanisms. On the contrary, the 16×8 FPA with the same area of the clustered-based 16×16 phased arrays, achieved with an interelement spacing of 0.72 0, suffers of grating lobes onset due to a PSLL = 0 dB.…”
Section: A Case 1: Maximum Steering Angle Of 0 = 60°mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design an 8 × 8 configuration with 2D scanning, the suggested active PAA used an I-shaped slot structure as the radiating element. This suggested GW-PAA in [63] was later upgraded and optimized to have a better scanning performance and output EIRP by making the GW-PAA considerably compact in size and improving the microwave electronics chain to obtain an E-plane scanning of ±60 • with an EIRP of 60 dBm, as shown in [64]. Moreover, a 16 × 16 GW-PAA with slant polarized is realized with the 45 • slant slot for 5G mmWave application with 2D scanning capability is presented in [65].…”
Section: Phased Array and Multibeam Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a strategic overhaul in the structural dynamics of the antenna array surface might be the cornerstone in harnessing its full potential. Such optimization strategies, tailored to endure high-power operational environments, would make these systems more versatile and adaptable to the ever-evolving complexities of contemporary battlefields [15][16][17]. Echoing this sentiment, it becomes clear that the ramifications of these studies aren't insular; they have the potential to invigorate technological progress across a spectrum of defence-related industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%