2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10276-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3,2-Hydroxypyridinone-based Decorporation Agent that Removes Uranium from Bones In Vivo

Abstract: Searching for actinide decorporation agents with advantages of high decorporation efficiency, minimal biological toxicity, and high oral efficiency is crucial for nuclear safety and the sustainable development of nuclear energy. Removing actinides deposited in bones after intake is one of the most significant challenges remaining in this field because of the instantaneous formation of highly stable actinide phosphate complexes upon contact with hydroxyapatite. Here we report a hydroxypyridinone-based ligand (5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other functional groups are also used for constructing uranium adsorbents, such as the engineered proteins 16 , 17 , bio-inspired nanostructures 18 20 , molecularly imprinted polymer 21 , and the network formed by hydroxyl groups 22 , and show enhanced uranium adsorption selectivity compared with the amidoxime group. These results indicate that the application of novel functional group is a promising strategy for developing novel uranium adsorbents 23 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Some other functional groups are also used for constructing uranium adsorbents, such as the engineered proteins 16 , 17 , bio-inspired nanostructures 18 20 , molecularly imprinted polymer 21 , and the network formed by hydroxyl groups 22 , and show enhanced uranium adsorption selectivity compared with the amidoxime group. These results indicate that the application of novel functional group is a promising strategy for developing novel uranium adsorbents 23 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is noted here that Si 2 C 3 -16C4 also forms a complex with uranyl ion, [UO 2 -Si 2 C 3 -16C4] 2+ (see Figure 3). The reason we had tried this particular ion is largely due to the fact that enormous amount of effort had already been devoted in making new chelating agents for UO 2+ 2 62, 63 . into uranyl oxides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason we had tried this particular ion is largely because an enormous amount of effort had already been devoted in making new chelating agents for UO22+ . [ 95,96 ] Here, we are proposing a new chelating agent for UO22+ whose binding energies are in the range of −213.97 to −238.26 kcal mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Owing to economics and versatility, chemical adsorption is considered to be the most promising technology for extracting uranium from seawater. 7,8 Recently, numerous porous materials have been developed for uranium extraction, [9][10][11][12][13] such as porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs), 14,15 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), 6,16 and porous organic polymers (POPs); 17 all of them exhibit impressive uranium extraction performance. However, most adsorbents have poor stability in complex marine environments, leading to decomposition during long-term immersion in the ocean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%