2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.12070
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A$^{3}$COSMOS: A census on the molecular gas mass and extent of main-sequence galaxies across cosmic time

Tsan-Ming Wang,
Benjamin Magnelli,
Eva Schinnerer
et al.

Abstract: Aims. To constrain for the first time the mean mass and extent of the molecular gas of a mass-complete sample of normal > 10 10 M star-forming galaxies at 0.4 < z < 3.6. Methods. We apply an innovative uv-based stacking analysis to a large set of archival Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations using a mass-complete sample of main-sequence (MS) galaxies. This stacking analysis, performed on the Rayleigh-Jeans dust continuum emission, provides accurate measurements of the mean mass and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(267 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 11, we include only molecular gas mass density estimates based on the untargeted CO observations (both in emission and absorption). There are references in the literature providing the estimates on the molecular gas mass density based on a different approach, which we did not include on the plot, e.g., scaled dust continuum, based on empirical gas-to-dust conversion (Scoville et al 2017;Liu et al 2019;Magnelli et al 2020;Garratt et al 2021;Wang et al 2022), radio continuum to CO luminosity conversion (Orellana-González et al 2020) or CO intensity mapping (see discussion in Popping & Péroux 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 11, we include only molecular gas mass density estimates based on the untargeted CO observations (both in emission and absorption). There are references in the literature providing the estimates on the molecular gas mass density based on a different approach, which we did not include on the plot, e.g., scaled dust continuum, based on empirical gas-to-dust conversion (Scoville et al 2017;Liu et al 2019;Magnelli et al 2020;Garratt et al 2021;Wang et al 2022), radio continuum to CO luminosity conversion (Orellana-González et al 2020) or CO intensity mapping (see discussion in Popping & Péroux 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.4. Cold gas content scaling relations at z ∼ 2 Recent studies have calibrated scaling relations of M mol , µ mol , and t depl as a function of redshift, M * , and SFR (or, equivalently, offset from the MS) by combining samples with Rayleigh-Jeans dust continuum and/or CO line emission observations spanning z = 0 − 4 (Genzel et al 2015;Scoville et al 2017;Tacconi et al 2018Tacconi et al , 2020Liu et al 2019;Wang et al 2022). These scaling relations potentially have great utility by providing estimates of the cold gas content of galaxies based on galaxy properties that are easier to directly constrain.…”
Section: A Budget Of Metals In Massive Z ∼ 2 Star-forming Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, single millimeter dust-continuum measurements in particular have been used as estimators of galaxy cold gas masses (see for example Scoville et al 2017, Kaasinen et al 2019. In some cases these recipes account for changes in the DTG as a function of metallicity (Bertemes et al 2018;Wang et al 2022), but not always. The robustness of such dust-based gas mass estimates will be improved by using the DTG-metallicity relation tabulated in Table 1.…”
Section: No Cosmic Evolution In Galaxy Dust Properties With Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 99%