2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.02018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3-D finite-element algorithm for DC resistivity modelling using the shifted incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method

Abstract: SUMMARY An accurate and efficient 3‐D finite‐element (FE) forward algorithm for DC resistivity modelling is developed. First, the total potential is decomposed into the primary potential caused by the source current and the secondary potential caused by changes in the electrical conductivity. Then, the boundary value problem for the secondary field and its equivalent variational problem are presented, where the finite‐element method is used. This removes the singularity caused by the primary potential, resulti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The iterative conjugate gradient algorithm (CG, Hestenes and Stiefel 1952) is widely used within the geophysical community (Wu 2003;Brodie and Sambridge 2006;Rücker et al 2006;Mueller-Petke and Yaramanci 2010), however, we employ the preconditioned bi-conjugate gradient stabilized algorithm (BICGSTAB, Van der Vorst 1992). Theoretically, CG should be the most suitable algorithm as our linear system is symmetric positive definite but we chose BICGSTAB due to its empirically proven stability in solving our particular problem.…”
Section: Sparse Matrices and Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterative conjugate gradient algorithm (CG, Hestenes and Stiefel 1952) is widely used within the geophysical community (Wu 2003;Brodie and Sambridge 2006;Rücker et al 2006;Mueller-Petke and Yaramanci 2010), however, we employ the preconditioned bi-conjugate gradient stabilized algorithm (BICGSTAB, Van der Vorst 1992). Theoretically, CG should be the most suitable algorithm as our linear system is symmetric positive definite but we chose BICGSTAB due to its empirically proven stability in solving our particular problem.…”
Section: Sparse Matrices and Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computers, there have been studies that attempt to calculate the electrical conductivity of two-phase or multi-phase rocks with numerical simulation methods (Bigalke, 1999;2000;2003;Yue et al, 2005;Lebovka et al, 2006;Hakobyan et al, 2007). The 3-D finite element method (FEM) can be used for the numerical simulation of arbitrary complex multi-phase media (Garboczi, 1998;Wu, 2003;Wu and Wang, 2003).…”
Section: Developed a Modifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3-D finite element method (FEM) can be used for the numerical simulation of arbitrary complex multi-phase media (Garboczi, 1998;Wu, 2003;Wu and Wang, 2003). Rock physics experiments cannot be quantitatively controlled by setting arbitrary electrical conductivity and volume fraction of multi-phase rocks (i.e., digital rock cores).…”
Section: Developed a Modifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of singularity-removal method(Wu, 2003) and our adaptive finite-element method. (a) Apparent resistivities from the final adaptive iteration (third mesh); (b) relative errors on the first mesh; (c) relative errors on the third mesh…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%