2018
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3‐node C0 triangular element for the modified couple stress theory based on the smoothed finite element method

Abstract: Summary In this paper, a 3‐node C0 triangular element for the modified couple stress theory is proposed. Unlike the classical continuum theory, the second‐order derivative of displacement is included in the weak form of the equilibrium equations. Thus, the first‐order derivative of displacement, such as the rotation, should be approximated by a continuous function. In the proposed element, the derivative of the displacement is defined at a node using the node‐based smoothed finite element method. The derivativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in [54], the curvature terms produced by the thickness-direction displacement contribute to the deformation energy in the modified couple stress theory, therefore the plane stress state cannot be accurately simulated through a two-dimensional simplification. Thus, only the plane strain state is considered in this work.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed in [54], the curvature terms produced by the thickness-direction displacement contribute to the deformation energy in the modified couple stress theory, therefore the plane stress state cannot be accurately simulated through a two-dimensional simplification. Thus, only the plane strain state is considered in this work.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3, the benchmark proposed in [54] is solved, in which the cantilever thin beam is subjected to a tip shear load. The reference flexural rigidity for the modified couple stress theory is given by [54]:…”
Section: The Cantilever Thin Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since the CST element exhibits a very stiff behavior, it is difficult to obtain a solution appropriately for the membrane dominant problem. In the proposed shell element, a membrane element developed by the current authors is used. This subsection summarizes the formulation of the membrane element.…”
Section: Smoothed Flat Shell Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past decades, great efforts have been made to develop robust plane elements for higher‐order continuum theories. For instance, Zervos et al formulated different C 1 triangular and quadrilateral elements for elastoplasticity strain gradient problems; Beheshti developed 4‐node quadrilateral elements based on the Hermite shape functions for the strain‐gradient elasticity; Papanicolopulos et al proposed a general framework for developing mixed finite elements for strain‐gradient boundary‐value problems using either Lagrange multiplier or penalty methods; Choi and Lee extended the smoothed FEM to the modified couple stress theory; Kwon and Lee proposed a mixed element formulation using the Lagrange multiplier method and the convergence criteria; Garg and Han developed penalty plane and axisymmetric elements for the couple stress elasticity in which the independent nodal drilling DOFs are introduced; Wang et al developed the quasi‐conforming C 0‐1 elements in which both nodal displacements and nodal displacement derivatives are adopted as DOFs for the modified couple stress theory; Chen and his coauthors also proposed similar models for the strain gradient/couple stress theories using the refined nonconforming element technique; Phunpeng and Baiz constructed a mixed element for strain‐gradient elasticity problems using the FEniCS environment; Sze and Wu formulated three 4‐node 24‐DOF quadrilateral elements for the gradient elasticity analysis by generalizing different thin plate element models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%