2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41368-022-00195-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D-printed molybdenum-containing scaffold exerts dual pro-osteogenic and anti-osteoclastogenic effects to facilitate alveolar bone repair

Abstract: The positive regulation of bone-forming osteoblast activity and the negative feedback regulation of osteoclastic activity are equally important in strategies to achieve successful alveolar bone regeneration. Here, a molybdenum (Mo)-containing bioactive glass ceramic scaffold with solid-strut-packed structures (Mo-scaffold) was printed, and its ability to regulate pro-osteogenic and anti-osteoclastogenic cellular responses was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. We found that extracts derived from Mo-scaffold (Mo-e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, 3D-printed bioceramics for mimicking the complicated structure of bones are also quite prevalent recently. 77,83,84 In conclusion, porous bioceramics, especially bioactive glass, can provide sufficient osteoconduction and mechanical strength for fracture fixation, along with releasing ions for facilitating bone regeneration, which can be a suitable material for BRF. However, most current bioceramics can not fully degrade after bone fracture union, which may pose an adverse effect to the bone healing.…”
Section: Bone Regenerative Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, 3D-printed bioceramics for mimicking the complicated structure of bones are also quite prevalent recently. 77,83,84 In conclusion, porous bioceramics, especially bioactive glass, can provide sufficient osteoconduction and mechanical strength for fracture fixation, along with releasing ions for facilitating bone regeneration, which can be a suitable material for BRF. However, most current bioceramics can not fully degrade after bone fracture union, which may pose an adverse effect to the bone healing.…”
Section: Bone Regenerative Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of Cu 2+ from Cu-BGC scaffolds can decrease the inflammatory response and promote the healing of the osteochondral interface (Figure e,f). In addition, 3D-printed bioceramics for mimicking the complicated structure of bones are also quite prevalent recently. ,, …”
Section: Bone Regenerative Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive strength and Young's modulus of the scaffold were 94.20 ± 28.60 and 1.21 ± 0.23 MPa, respectively, satisfying the load-bearing requirement of rat cortical bone. 30 Ability of the scaffold to preserve water along with maintaining a well-organized structure is another important aspect to evaluate its comprehensive performance. Moderate water absorption capability serves as a fundamental principle enabling an ingress of liquid into the scaffold's interstitial spaces, thereby ensuring an optimal degradation profile that aligns harmoniously with the desired bone regeneration timeline.…”
Section: Physical Characterizations Of Untreated Plla/hamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using fused deposition modeling, biphasic solid porous biomaterials were created. In order to promote the simultaneous transport of two cell types (stem cells and osteoblasts) for the repair of the AB-periodontal ligament complex, they were fabricated with TCP as the bone component and PCL microfibrous membrane as the periodontal component [100][101][102][103].…”
Section: Biomatrices For Bone Transplantation That Are 3d Printedmentioning
confidence: 99%