2020
DOI: 10.3389/fceng.2020.589686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D-Printed Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 Monolith For Flue- and Biogas Separations by Adsorption: Influence of Flow Distribution and Process Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found the highest CO 2 capture with the lowest biogas inflow rate. Generally, the breakthrough occurred faster with increasing flow rates due to the fact that the adsorbate phase did not have enough time to be in contact with adsorbent particles [45,46]. Rattanaphan et al [22] obtained lower sorption capacity, ranging from 60.64-78.98 mg/g of 40% CO 2 , from swine farm biogas on activated carbon prepared from modified waste tea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the highest CO 2 capture with the lowest biogas inflow rate. Generally, the breakthrough occurred faster with increasing flow rates due to the fact that the adsorbate phase did not have enough time to be in contact with adsorbent particles [45,46]. Rattanaphan et al [22] obtained lower sorption capacity, ranging from 60.64-78.98 mg/g of 40% CO 2 , from swine farm biogas on activated carbon prepared from modified waste tea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, to shape engineer adsorbents, various powder processing routes such as extrusion and pressing, [ 21 ] gelation, [ 22 ] coating, [ 23 ] solvent‐free hot‐pressing, [ 24 ] and 3D‐printing [ 25 ] are available. These techniques offer an advantageous approach but there are certain considerations to address.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] 3D printed MOF monoliths were reported using a variety of supports, 4,[25][26][27][28] including MOF-74, 29 the University of Texas at San Antonio-16 (UTSA-16), 30 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST-1), 31 leaf-like zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-L), 32 and ZIF-8. [33][34][35][36] This advanced the shaping and processing of MOF materials. 37 3D printing offers the processing of the materials into a hierarchical structure with tunable properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%