2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.104480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D reconstruction method of bubble flow field based on multi-view images by bi-direction filtering maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CNNs have proven to be superior to traditional computer vision methods for image segmentation, achieving high resolution (He et al, 2020;Hessenkemper et al, 2022). Various CNN approaches have been explored for bubble segmentation, such as the use of region-based CNNs like Faster-RCNN (Haas et al, 2020), sliding window-based CNN (Poletaev et al, 2020), and the implementation of segmentation masks through Mask RCNN, which not only classifies but also assigns each pixel to individual bubble objects (Cui et al, 2021;Hessenkemper et al, 2022;Kim & Park, 2021;Wang et al, 2023). Although significant progress made with CNN-based techniques has been made in recent years, challenges persist in segmenting very complex images, such as those obtained in industrial settings, which are typically subject to wide bubble-size distributions, high gas content, cloudiness due to the presence of solid particles, and lighting issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs have proven to be superior to traditional computer vision methods for image segmentation, achieving high resolution (He et al, 2020;Hessenkemper et al, 2022). Various CNN approaches have been explored for bubble segmentation, such as the use of region-based CNNs like Faster-RCNN (Haas et al, 2020), sliding window-based CNN (Poletaev et al, 2020), and the implementation of segmentation masks through Mask RCNN, which not only classifies but also assigns each pixel to individual bubble objects (Cui et al, 2021;Hessenkemper et al, 2022;Kim & Park, 2021;Wang et al, 2023). Although significant progress made with CNN-based techniques has been made in recent years, challenges persist in segmenting very complex images, such as those obtained in industrial settings, which are typically subject to wide bubble-size distributions, high gas content, cloudiness due to the presence of solid particles, and lighting issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of particle size, this problem has been addressed by employing 3D measurement techniques such as 3D X-ray micro-CT [14,15]. Although there exist some 3D techniques available for bubble size measurement [16][17][18][19], these have not been widely adopted in froth flotation or mineral processing due to the multiphase nature of flotation and the practical constraints of using multiple cameras. Most practitioners and researchers continue to measure bubble size using a 2D single-camera approach, and therefore it is critical to quantify the impact of bubble size uncertainties on flotation and reagent assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%