2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9274(99)00060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D refinement/derefinement algorithm for solving evolution problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency arises because coarsening operations prevent the exponential increase in the number of nodes that would otherwise occur from refinement operations. To date, derefinement operations have been developed for nested meshes generated from edge bisection [24] and none exist for 8-subtetrahedron subdivision. A local derefinement algorithm in the nested meshes created by the 8-subtetrahedron subdivision has been developed by the authors and implemented also in this work.…”
Section: Mesh Derefinement-meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency arises because coarsening operations prevent the exponential increase in the number of nodes that would otherwise occur from refinement operations. To date, derefinement operations have been developed for nested meshes generated from edge bisection [24] and none exist for 8-subtetrahedron subdivision. A local derefinement algorithm in the nested meshes created by the 8-subtetrahedron subdivision has been developed by the authors and implemented also in this work.…”
Section: Mesh Derefinement-meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d i,jk is defined by (22) The plane equations for the triangles F j , F k , and F l become (23) with α, β, γ = j, k, l cyclic, respectively. 4-vectors r j , r k , and r l for intersection points with respect to F j , F k , and F l can be derived from (9) and (23), and the resulting interpolation coefficients t j , t k , and t l are given by (24) with α, β, γ = j, k, l cyclic. At the end, any points inside C will be switched into P, Q, R, or Sbased representation using (18)-(21) for finite element assembly related two leaf tetrahedrons separately from M and M′.…”
Section: Intersections In C 4a -Containermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is certainly member of set (14), and since at least φ (j+1) i is deactivated, the refinement set of φ (j) i is guaranteed not to be complete at the end of the unrefinement step. Hence, activating φ (j) i cannot introduce a linear dependency: the linear independence requirement is preserved.…”
Section: Unrefinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of approaches are being used to resolve this issue (see Reference [4] for a good introduction): (i) the unknowns of the incompatibly placed nodes are constrained with respect to other nodes so that compatibility of the resulting approximation is ensured even though the mesh remains incompatible; (ii) incompatibility is treated with Lagrangian multipliers or penalty methods; (iii) compatibility of the mesh is achieved by splitting additional elements until the mesh becomes globally compatible by construction. A number of specialized mesh refinement schemes have been proposed for a variety of practically important cases, for triangular and quadrilateral meshes in two dimensions [17,3,15,16], tetrahedral [19,9,10,14,13,1], or hexahedral meshes in three dimensions [8]. A critical review of the existing adaptive algorithms based on mesh refinement leads to the conclusion that they tend to be quite complex (constraint methods, splitting of neighboring elements), or lead to undesirable algorithmic features (Lagrange multipliers, penalty methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local grid refinement techniques have been developed in two dimensions for triangle and quadrilaterals ( [2,8,[19][20][21]27] and in three dimensions for tetrahedrals [1,12,13,17,18,31] and for hexahedrals [11,14,15]. Barry et al [3] applied libraries developed by the SUMAA3d project to solve plasticity problems on a parallel platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%