2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D structural analysis of the Goliat field, Barents Sea, Norway

Abstract: This thesis has been submitted to the Department of Geosciences at the University of Oslo (UiO) in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor (PhD). The work presented herein was conducted between August 2013 and July 2017 during which time I was employed as a PhD research fellow at the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) and enrolled in a PhD program at UiO.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 220 publications
(306 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The observations and interpretations reported in this study are relevant to studies in the Barents Sea region, as the Kvalpynten strata extend offshore , where similar successions have been documented at sub-seismic to seismic scale (e.g. Mulrooney, Leutscher, & Braathen, 2017;Serck, Faleide, Braathen, Kjølhamar, & Escalona, 2017). More broadly, this study provides insights into facies associations and facies architectures that can be expected in other growth-faulted deltaic successions systems around the world.…”
Section: Highlightssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…• The observations and interpretations reported in this study are relevant to studies in the Barents Sea region, as the Kvalpynten strata extend offshore , where similar successions have been documented at sub-seismic to seismic scale (e.g. Mulrooney, Leutscher, & Braathen, 2017;Serck, Faleide, Braathen, Kjølhamar, & Escalona, 2017). More broadly, this study provides insights into facies associations and facies architectures that can be expected in other growth-faulted deltaic successions systems around the world.…”
Section: Highlightssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The Barents Shelf, including Svalbard and the Southwestern Barents Sea region, is characterized by subtle tectonic activity throughout the Triassic (Glørstad-Clark, Faleide, Lundschien, & Nystuen, 2010;Klausen, 2013); however, some fault complexes experiencing mild reactivation (Anell, Braathen, Olaussen, & Osmundsen, 2013;Maher, Ogata, & Braathen, 2016;Mulrooney, Leutscher, & Braathen, 2017;Osmundsen, Braathen, Rød, & Hynne, 2014;Serck, Faleide, Braathen, Kjølhamar, & Escalona, 2017). More comprehensive tectonic events occurred especially in the southwest (Breivik, Faleide, & Gudlaugsson, 1998;Gabrielsen, 1984;Johansen et al, 1993;Mørk, Embry, & Weitschat, 1989).…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E‐W trends and the anomalies tied to the TFFC might be indications of minor local late Triassic tectonic activity along this master fault (Mulrooney et al. ). However, the fidelity of the flattening process is questionable in areas with dense faulting, which limits the resolution of the extracted anomalies, especially when dealing with very thin sands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) and it cuts across the Goliat Field. The TFFC has a series of listric normal faults (Faleide, Gudlaugsson and Jacquart 1984;Gabrielsen 1984;Gabrielsen et al 1990;Mulrooney, Leutscher and Braathen 2017) forming a prominent roll-over anticline that provides structural closure for the field. Later Cenozoic uplift and exhumation in the Goliat area resulted in approximately 1000 to 1500 m of net erosion (Ohm, Karlsen and Austin 2008;Henriksen et al 2011b;Baig et al 2016).…”
Section: G E O L O G I C a L S E T T I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%