2015
DOI: 10.1142/s021821651550056x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 4-string tangle analysis of DNA-protein complexes based on difference topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We solved all such equations in which the twist knot had fewer than 100,000 crossings by writing a simple C program (code available upon request). This allows us to use the results in Darcy et al (2009) and Kim and Darcy (2015) to prove that the only biologically relevant tangle model representing P is a three-branched structure if P binds three DNA segments or R-standard if P binds to four DNA segments.…”
Section: Mathematical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We solved all such equations in which the twist knot had fewer than 100,000 crossings by writing a simple C program (code available upon request). This allows us to use the results in Darcy et al (2009) and Kim and Darcy (2015) to prove that the only biologically relevant tangle model representing P is a three-branched structure if P binds three DNA segments or R-standard if P binds to four DNA segments.…”
Section: Mathematical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology has significantly advanced, but it is still unsuccessful for large complexes in which proteins bind multiple DNA segments. To study protein-bound DNA, an experimental technique called difference topology combined with the mathematics of tangle analysis has been used (Kimura et al, 1999;Pathania et al, 2002;Petrushenko et al, 2006;Darcy et al, 2009;Kim and Darcy, 2015). Note that this technique focuses on determining the topology of DNA bound in a protein complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first experiment, the product DNA of Cre recombination is a 3-noded knot (trefoil), which means there are three crossings between E &L and E & R. In the second experiment, the product DNA of Cre recombination is also a 3-noded knot (trefoil), which implies there are three crossings between L &E and L&R. In the third experiment, the product DNA of Cre recombination is 4-noded link, which means there are four crossings between R &E and R &L. From putting all results together, one can conclude that the DNA topology within the Mu transpososome has 3-branched(this is biologically reasonable assumption [12]) five noded configuration such that two crossings between E &R and L&R, one crossing between E &L. Remark that Pathania et al performed more experiments considering the orientation of Cre binding sites and linear DNA with Enhancer site. See [12,13,4,9,10,3] for more detail.…”
Section: Difference Topology Experiments Of Mu-transpososomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a circular DNA binds to a protein, the conformation of the DNA-protein complex is simply a ball (protein) with a circular string (DNA) which is very similar to the shape of a tangle. A tangle model for DNA-protein complexes are introduced by C. Ernst and D. Sumners in late 80's (see Figure 15) and mathematical analysis of a tangle model is very useful for understanding biological activities of the complex [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,15,16,20,12,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%