2018
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.73.1147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 400-mA Stable Beam Store with a Superconducting RF System at the PLS-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because only a few percent forward power fluctuation can be tolerated by the LLRF control, a He vessel pressure fluctuation of 4 mar is more likely to lead to mishandling of LLRF control. As comparative data, the pressure fluctuation of the He vessel pressure was limited to ±1.5 mbar to maintain the forward power fluctuation between ±1% in the design report of the PLS-II SRF system [3]. Before and after applying the solution for the Type-1 beam dump, the He vessel pressure of CM1 increased by 4.17 mbar for 6 seconds and 1.02 mbar for 8 seconds, respectively, at the beginning of the warmup process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because only a few percent forward power fluctuation can be tolerated by the LLRF control, a He vessel pressure fluctuation of 4 mar is more likely to lead to mishandling of LLRF control. As comparative data, the pressure fluctuation of the He vessel pressure was limited to ±1.5 mbar to maintain the forward power fluctuation between ±1% in the design report of the PLS-II SRF system [3]. Before and after applying the solution for the Type-1 beam dump, the He vessel pressure of CM1 increased by 4.17 mbar for 6 seconds and 1.02 mbar for 8 seconds, respectively, at the beginning of the warmup process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%