ESSCIRC 2017 - 43rd IEEE European Solid State Circuits Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/esscirc.2017.8094519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 400 MHz 4.5 nW −63.8 dBm sensitivity wake-up receiver employing an active pseudo-balun envelope detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RF tuning and hardware optimization: We expect that the performance of Morpho can be increased substantially with better RF optimization. Other work has reported tens of meters backscatter range and higher sensitivity passive detectors [18,33,49,52]. Such improvements can extend our techniques to larger sized areas (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RF tuning and hardware optimization: We expect that the performance of Morpho can be increased substantially with better RF optimization. Other work has reported tens of meters backscatter range and higher sensitivity passive detectors [18,33,49,52]. Such improvements can extend our techniques to larger sized areas (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This is shown in Figure 3, where a second envelope detector (in red) is tailored for low rate control messages where range is more important than rate. A significant sensitivity gap can be expected between these two detectors -for example, a state-of-art detector for rates of 100 kbps has a receive sensitivity of -50 dBm whereas a detector for low rates of a few kbps has a receive sensitivity of -68 dBm [52].…”
Section: Morpho Sensor Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sophisticated WuRx designs include active elements, offering additional features, such as the possibility to send WuC to a specific WuRx or group of receivers (i.e., addressable WuC) or the capacity to decode and process binary data embedded in the WuC. Still, even with the presence of active elements, a WuRx requires power in the scale of µW, or even nW [7].…”
Section: State Of the Art On Ieee 80211-based Wake-up Radio Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sophisticated WuRx designs include active elements, offering additional features, such as the possibility to send WuC to a specific WuRx or group of receivers (i.e., addressable WuC) or the capacity to decode and process binary data embedded in the WuC. Still, even with the presence of active elements, a WuRx requires power in the scale of µ W, or even nW [7]. In the case of IEEE 802.11-based WuR, the Wi-Fi radio is considered as the primary radio used for the regular exchange of data frames, which benefits from the security features, and high transmission rates supported by the IEEE 802.11 specifications.…”
Section: State Of the Art On Ieee 80211-based Wake-up Radio Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, all correlator-based WuRx designs implicitly feature addressing capabilities. The addressable WuRx proposed in [8] is one of the lowest power solutions in the literature, consuming a mere 4.5 nW. To achieve such low power with an impressive −63.8 dBm sensitivity, its design also uses the envelope detector and correlator approach.…”
Section: Wake-up Radio Systems So Farmentioning
confidence: 99%