2003 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2003. Digest of Technical Papers. ISSCC.
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2003.1234220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 43mW Bluetooth transceiver with -91dBm sensitivity

Abstract: As Bluetooth V1.1 [1] compliance is achieved by several solutions, the original low power objective re-emerges as a key factor for integration in portable devices. Since the standard -70dBm sensitivity was achieved with ease, commercial solutions have converged on a worst-case -80dBm sensitivity to attain longer reach from Class-2 output power (< 4mW) devices. This paper presents the second generation of a 1.8V Bluetooth transceiver [2]. Peak current consumption is 24mA for the receiver and 18mA for the transm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noncoherent detection schemes tend to be lower power. Adapted from ref [27,[28][29][30][31][32][33] for 80-85 in the figure and [34][35][36][37][38][39] for 106-111 in the figure Fig. 3.33 Schematic of non-coherent detection scheme Short transient decay times allow the receiver to be duty cycled to less than 0.1 % (10 ns in a 10 us period), yielding an average power consumption of ~ 12 µW in our 90 nm CMOS example, including leakage.…”
Section: Peak-detection Based Self-timed Pulse-detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncoherent detection schemes tend to be lower power. Adapted from ref [27,[28][29][30][31][32][33] for 80-85 in the figure and [34][35][36][37][38][39] for 106-111 in the figure Fig. 3.33 Schematic of non-coherent detection scheme Short transient decay times allow the receiver to be duty cycled to less than 0.1 % (10 ns in a 10 us period), yielding an average power consumption of ~ 12 µW in our 90 nm CMOS example, including leakage.…”
Section: Peak-detection Based Self-timed Pulse-detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional transceiver architectures as shown in Fig.1 include heterodyne, zero-IF (intermediate-frequency), and low-IF conversion structure (P. S. Choi et al (2003), C. Cojocaru et al (2003), M. Valla et al (2005), Ilku-Nam et al (2003)), each having their own advantages and disadvantages. However, it becomes further challenging to meet all the specifications of many applications while keeping more competitiveness than the others.…”
Section: The Radio System Architecture For Wireless Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-IF and zero-IF architectures can achieve much better performance at low-power consumption and are well suited for high integration. The concept of the low-IF (P. S. Choi et al (2003), C. Cojocaru et al (2003)) starts from the survey that all information necessary to separate the mirror frequency from the wanted frequency is available in the two low frequencies after quadrature conversion. This scheme can avoid the DC offset problem and eliminate IF SAW and image RF filters.…”
Section: The Radio System Architecture For Wireless Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gain stage followed by filter stage relaxes filter noise requirements while demanding a high linearity amplifier. The use of alternating filter and gain stages allows a better trade-off to be obtained between the noise and linearity for each stage by progressively reducing the dynamic range as the signal level is amplified [5]. In this design, the total filter rejection of 90 dB at 40 MHz and unity gain of the filter stage are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%