1947
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)31609-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 55-pound solid uterine myoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no techno-economic or environmental studies specifically focused on the evaluation of GTP routes technology. The current literature deals instead with the assessment of routes integrating olefin production from industrial and urban organic wastes or general biomass, as a wider context. , This might be related to the major progress in research and technology made in the field of these processes. ,, Some of these concepts have already entered the testing stage or industrial development; i) SABIC technology (The Netherlands and Saudi Arabia) is based on the cofeeding of “second generation” animal fats and vegetable oils with petroleum feedstocks, , ii) The BRASKEM approach (Brazil) involves sugar cane fermentation to bioethanol followed by dehydration to bioethylene and further dimerization and metathesis to biopropylene, , iii) The MITSUI chemical route (Japan) involves second generation biomass fermentation to biobutanol, followed by dehydration to biobutylene and metathesis with ethylene to produce green propylene, for example. Furthermore, the most developed concept, which is employed by many companies (e.g., ExxonMobil, TotalEnergies, and Shell Global Solutions) involves the initial gasification of second-generation biomass and urban wastes to produce syngas, followed by FTS of methanol.…”
Section: The State-of-the-art Of Gtp Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no techno-economic or environmental studies specifically focused on the evaluation of GTP routes technology. The current literature deals instead with the assessment of routes integrating olefin production from industrial and urban organic wastes or general biomass, as a wider context. , This might be related to the major progress in research and technology made in the field of these processes. ,, Some of these concepts have already entered the testing stage or industrial development; i) SABIC technology (The Netherlands and Saudi Arabia) is based on the cofeeding of “second generation” animal fats and vegetable oils with petroleum feedstocks, , ii) The BRASKEM approach (Brazil) involves sugar cane fermentation to bioethanol followed by dehydration to bioethylene and further dimerization and metathesis to biopropylene, , iii) The MITSUI chemical route (Japan) involves second generation biomass fermentation to biobutanol, followed by dehydration to biobutylene and metathesis with ethylene to produce green propylene, for example. Furthermore, the most developed concept, which is employed by many companies (e.g., ExxonMobil, TotalEnergies, and Shell Global Solutions) involves the initial gasification of second-generation biomass and urban wastes to produce syngas, followed by FTS of methanol.…”
Section: The State-of-the-art Of Gtp Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%