2014
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 6-year retrospective review of pediatric firearm injuries

Abstract: Results from this study suggest that firearm injuries differ in younger patients compared with adolescents. The younger subset was more likely to be shot at home versus public settings. Hospital and emergency medical services records lacked important shooting details often found in crime scene reports, which are necessary for the development of effective crime and prevention strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study using administrative emergency department data, reported that most frequently documented firearm injuries were assaults followed by unintentional injuries among those children who were B18 years old [2]. This reversal maybe due to the inclusion of pediatric FH below 16 years, and can be rationalized by the distinct firearm injury differences between children (\16 years) and adolescents [9]. Unlike the experience of the pediatric FHs in our study, national cumulative FHs were mostly due to assault intent, where majority were adults [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study using administrative emergency department data, reported that most frequently documented firearm injuries were assaults followed by unintentional injuries among those children who were B18 years old [2]. This reversal maybe due to the inclusion of pediatric FH below 16 years, and can be rationalized by the distinct firearm injury differences between children (\16 years) and adolescents [9]. Unlike the experience of the pediatric FHs in our study, national cumulative FHs were mostly due to assault intent, where majority were adults [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Both assault and unintentional injuries have been implicated as leading causes of FH depending on the age of the children [12,17]. Recent evidence suggests that the declining trend in firearm fatalities was attributed to decline in firearm homicide rates among those aged 15-19 years [6], and that FHs among those \15 years have different risk profiles as compared to older children [9]. The difference in firearm injury by race is associated with the intent of injury, where white children were injured after unintentional firearm discharge, whereas most black children were shot violently [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recent epidemiological research 14,16,17,33 has focused on defining the incidence and trends in firearm-related injuries among children to better understand the characteristics of such injuries and to inform injury prevention efforts. Our multisite study adds to the literature as it is one of the largest studies to date to describe the characteristics of children with firearm injuries, especially those sustaining non-fatal firearm injuries, and it is the first to examine the relative influence of individual and neighborhood factors on firearm injury risk among a cohort of children seeking ED care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger adults between the age of 16 and 45 years hospitalized for firearm injury were more likely to be injured by assault 7 11 as compared with older adults who are hospitalized for self-inflicted injuries. 12 Older youth between 16–19 years of age had firearm injury profile similar to that of adults, 13 particularly with respect to firearm homicide rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%