2021
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2021.3094524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 64 × 64 SPAD-Based Indirect Time-of-Flight Image Sensor With 2-Tap Analog Pulse Counters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to our previous work in [1] this pixel design has a comparable power consumption while extending the counting range of the pixel to 9-bits compared to [2]. It implements a novel timing sequence to allow for a digital DRS readout scheme and makes use of a dynamic comparator and low voltage clocking scheme to save on clock distribution power compared to [6]. Furthermore, compared to [2] the pixel has a completely in-pixel analog feedback line allowing easy scale-up to large resolution arrays without affecting its capacitive load and conversion speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to our previous work in [1] this pixel design has a comparable power consumption while extending the counting range of the pixel to 9-bits compared to [2]. It implements a novel timing sequence to allow for a digital DRS readout scheme and makes use of a dynamic comparator and low voltage clocking scheme to save on clock distribution power compared to [6]. Furthermore, compared to [2] the pixel has a completely in-pixel analog feedback line allowing easy scale-up to large resolution arrays without affecting its capacitive load and conversion speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that any variability between the SPAD and PULSE pulses can cause an error due to different pulse shapes driving the comparator and therefore the analog counters, thus modulating their step size. To resolve this issue a pulse shaper as used in [6] can be implemented with a slight area penalty as the tradeoff.…”
Section: In-pixel Digital Drs Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [6], a 64 × 64 SPAD flash LIDAR sensor in 130 nm HV CMOS with a combination of TDCs and triple integration interpolators is used to reach a timing resolution of 13 ps, corresponding to a depth resolution of 1.95 mm. In [7], a 64 × 64 iTOF SPAD sensor array in a 110 nm technology is presented, using analog pulse counters that achieves a precision of down to 1.35 cm with a fill factor (FF) of 26.3% and a DCR of 100 cps. A modulation frequency of up to 50 MHz is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illustrating the strength of our system, we experimentally show that the modulator can be used with a standard camera to enable high spatial-resolution ToF imaging. Our approach enables an attractive alternative to complex LiDAR systems relying on optical phased arrays (OPAs) and SLMs 22,[28][29][30][31][32] with thousands of control elements or highly specialized costly image sensors that are difficult to implement with a large number of pixels [33][34][35][36][37] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%