2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14071744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 95-Year-Old Concrete Arch Bridge: From Materials Characterization to Structural Analysis

Abstract: The structural analysis of a 95-year-old concrete arch bridge located in Jagodnik (Poland) is performed in this paper, in order to check its behavior under today’s traffic loads. The mechanical properties of both the concrete and the reinforcement are investigated by testing cores and bar stubs extracted from the bridge. Structural analysis confirms that the bridge meets today’s load requirements in terms of bearing capacity, serviceability state, and that the adopted structural improvements (a new deck slab o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…123-year-old concrete bridge Paulík [17] Slovakia 107-year-old bridge Rabiega et al [18] Poland 104-year-old bridge Sena-Cruz et al [19] Portugal 100-year-old bridge Słomka-Słupik et al [20] Poland 100-year-old reinforced concrete dome Onysyk et al [21] Poland 100-year-old bridge Witzany and Zigler [22] Czech Republic 100-year-old reinforced concrete flat slab bridge Wolert et al [23] USA 100-year-old reinforced concrete viaduct Jóźwiak-Niedźwiecka and Tucholsk [24] Poland 95-year-old viaduct Hellebois et al ([25,26]) Belgium 95-year-old concrete dam Blanco et al [27] Spain 95-year-old concrete arch bridge Ambroziak and Malinowski [28], Ambroziak et al [29] Poland 90-year old concrete mortar Trägårdh and Lagerblad [30] Sweden 84-year-old reinforced concrete bridge Gebauer and Harni [31] Switzerland 80-year-old reinforced concrete structure Melchers and Chaves [32] Australia 70-years-old concrete office building Ambroziak et al [ The present investigation of old concrete is related to a former palace building, called Leipziger Palace. The former Leipziger Palace in Wrocław (Poland) was built on the site of a riding school, from 1872 to 1874, by the banker Ignacy (Ignatz) Leipziger.…”
Section: Investigation Subject References Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…123-year-old concrete bridge Paulík [17] Slovakia 107-year-old bridge Rabiega et al [18] Poland 104-year-old bridge Sena-Cruz et al [19] Portugal 100-year-old bridge Słomka-Słupik et al [20] Poland 100-year-old reinforced concrete dome Onysyk et al [21] Poland 100-year-old bridge Witzany and Zigler [22] Czech Republic 100-year-old reinforced concrete flat slab bridge Wolert et al [23] USA 100-year-old reinforced concrete viaduct Jóźwiak-Niedźwiecka and Tucholsk [24] Poland 95-year-old viaduct Hellebois et al ([25,26]) Belgium 95-year-old concrete dam Blanco et al [27] Spain 95-year-old concrete arch bridge Ambroziak and Malinowski [28], Ambroziak et al [29] Poland 90-year old concrete mortar Trägårdh and Lagerblad [30] Sweden 84-year-old reinforced concrete bridge Gebauer and Harni [31] Switzerland 80-year-old reinforced concrete structure Melchers and Chaves [32] Australia 70-years-old concrete office building Ambroziak et al [ The present investigation of old concrete is related to a former palace building, called Leipziger Palace. The former Leipziger Palace in Wrocław (Poland) was built on the site of a riding school, from 1872 to 1874, by the banker Ignacy (Ignatz) Leipziger.…”
Section: Investigation Subject References Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insights of these experiments, as well as the literature review carried out by the authors, provide guidance to bridge engineers who are faced with the problem of assessing existing bridges using historical concrete mixes. Then, the authors used this information in [ 8 ] to perform a structural analysis of the bridge. Using insights from the material investigation resulted in the conclusion that the bridge fulfilled the code requirements and that it could remain in service.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%