2021
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202101462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Balance Between Capture and Release: How Nanochaperones Regulate Refolding of Thermally Denatured Proteins

Abstract: Nanochaperones have been designed and used for regulating the (re)folding of proteins, treating protein misfolding‐related diseases, and, more recently, in drug delivery. Despite various successes, a complete understanding of the working mechanisms remains elusive, which represents a challenge for the realization of their full potential. Here, we thoroughly investigated the functioning of differently charged nanochaperones that regulate the refolding of thermally denatured lysozyme. We found that the balance b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a prerequisite for the prophylactic use in α‐synucleinopathy because tight capture of α‐Syn monomer would affect its normal function. In our previous work, the balance between the capture and release of different protein targets could be regulated by adjusting the ratio of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions [5c] . The solvent‐exposed hydrophobic surface of monomeric α‐Syn increases when it is transformed into toxic oligomers, [7a] which is similar to the properties of folded and unfolded protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a prerequisite for the prophylactic use in α‐synucleinopathy because tight capture of α‐Syn monomer would affect its normal function. In our previous work, the balance between the capture and release of different protein targets could be regulated by adjusting the ratio of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions [5c] . The solvent‐exposed hydrophobic surface of monomeric α‐Syn increases when it is transformed into toxic oligomers, [7a] which is similar to the properties of folded and unfolded protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the synthesized nanochaperones have considerable refolding capabilities compared to the previously reported nanochaperones by our group. 27,45 The synthetic nanochaperones developed here can be used to assist the refolding of bulk denatured proteins to their bioactive form, and stabilize native proteins for long-term storage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Inspired by natural chaperones, we have developed a series of self-assembled mixedshell polymeric micelle (MSPM) based nanochaperones and shown that they are efficient in regulating the activities of proteins, such as (re)folding, misfolding and aggregation. [24][25][26][27] The MSPMs are generally fabricated by the self-assembly of two or more amphiphilic di-block polymers in selective solvents. [28][29][30][31][32] However, this manufacturing method is complicated and time-consuming, and the concentration of the final products is low, which greatly restricts its large-scale applicability in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomacromolecules, including proteins and nucleic acids, often play pivotal roles during cellular biotransformation. , Generally, the regulation process of their activities is accomplished through the assistance of molecular chaperones in crowded microenvironments. , However, the lesion of their biological activity is unavoidable due to extracellular environments during their applications in diagnostics and therapeutics. , To improve the stability of proteins effectively, various synthetic or natural materials have been used as their artificial chaperones and combined with them to form the corresponding hybrid conjugates. , Typically, these combination processes are accomplished by embedding the active site of biomacromolecules into synthetic scaffolds through covalent and/or noncovalent interactions. , In particular, combination ways between proteins and scaffolds via supramolecular interactions, such as electrostatic interactions, are more flexible . This provides these conjugates with more possible adjustability (such as release capabilities) of biomacromolecules without destroying their bioactivity. , Notably, utilization of stimulus response macromolecules as the scaffold for proteins brings convenience for the regulation of their bioactivities and release processes of the proteins under designated conditions (for instance, temperature, pH, or degrading enzyme). , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,6 Typically, these combination processes are accomplished by embedding the active site of biomacromolecules into synthetic scaffolds through covalent and/or noncovalent interactions. 5,7 In particular, combination ways between proteins and scaffolds via supramolecular interactions, such as electrostatic interactions, are more flexible. 8 This provides these conjugates with more possible adjustability (such as release capabilities) of biomacromolecules without destroying their bioactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%