2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences

Abstract: This article reports on a qualitative study which explored online student engagement experiences in a higher education institution. There are very few studies providing in-depth perspectives on the engagement experiences of online students. The project adopted a case study approach, following 24 online students over one academic year. The setting for the study was an undergraduate online Humanities programme at Dublin City University. The research question for the study was: What themes are central to online s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
157
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
13
157
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies, however, cannot provide the overall context and comparative importance. Some studies have examined the overall learning experience of students with exploratory lists, but have mixed non-quality factors with quality of teaching factors making it difficult to discern the instructor’s versus contextual roles in quality (e.g., Asoodar, Vaezi, & Izanloo, 2016 ; Bollinger & Martindale, 2004 ; Farrell & Brunton, 2020 ; Hong, 2002 ; Song, Singleton, Hill, & Koh, 2004 ; Sun, Tsai, Finger, Chen, & Yeh, 2008 ). The application of technology adoption studies also fall into this category by essentially aggregating all teaching quality in the single category of performance ( Al-Gahtani, 2016 ; Artino, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies, however, cannot provide the overall context and comparative importance. Some studies have examined the overall learning experience of students with exploratory lists, but have mixed non-quality factors with quality of teaching factors making it difficult to discern the instructor’s versus contextual roles in quality (e.g., Asoodar, Vaezi, & Izanloo, 2016 ; Bollinger & Martindale, 2004 ; Farrell & Brunton, 2020 ; Hong, 2002 ; Song, Singleton, Hill, & Koh, 2004 ; Sun, Tsai, Finger, Chen, & Yeh, 2008 ). The application of technology adoption studies also fall into this category by essentially aggregating all teaching quality in the single category of performance ( Al-Gahtani, 2016 ; Artino, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more research is needed related to online teaching (e.g. studies show that engagement decreases in online teaching compared to face-to-face teaching; Farrell & Brunton, 2020) but also related to the use of social networks and digital ecosystems to provide opportunities to increase engagement (Ansari & Khan, 2020). Future research should investigate this field which, due to its complexity, deserves a research framework in itself (Bond et al, 2020).…”
Section: Comments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important if we take into account the multiple transformations that have occurred in the educational eld during the last decades (Lee, 2019). In fact, the gure of the student in virtual environments as an apprentice with a higher level of autonomy, not only emerges as a consequence of the development and use of digital technologies in educational contexts, but also emerges from previous efforts aimed at positioning the student as a leading actor in teaching and learning processes, and as a result strengthens their autonomous learning (Farrell & Brunton, 2020). Pallof & Pratt (2013), for example, suggest the pro le of the successful online student, that although emergent and mediated through the use of computers, is marked by the abilities and skills to manage the tools and resources of these learning environments.…”
Section: The Student In Virtual Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%