“…Since then there has been a long and lively debate on MEP. This conjecture, often controversial (Goody, 2007;Caldeira, 2007;Nicolis and Nicolis, 2010), has been mainly tested through simple energy-balance boxmodels (Paltridge, 1975(Paltridge, , 1978(Paltridge, , 1981Grassl, 1981;Noda and Tokioka, 1983;Lorenz et al, 2001;Pujol and Fort, 2002;Pujol, 2003;Kleidon, 2004Kleidon, , 2010Jupp and Cox, 2010;Herbert et al, 2011a) and, in a few cases, general circulation models (Kleidon et al, 2003(Kleidon et al, , 2006Ito and Kleidon, 2005;Kunz et al, 2008;Pascale et al, 2011b) whereas a rigorous mathematical proof is still missing (Dewar, 2005;Grinstein and Linsker, 2007). Therefore despite some evidence which has built up in geosciences and despite its attraction of offering a beautiful unifying picture for all disequilibrium processes in the Earth system (Kleidon, 2010) and for the several co-related extremal principles known in Fluid Dynamics (Malkus, 1954(Malkus, , 1956(Malkus, , 2003Lorenz, 1960;Busse, 1969Busse, , 1970, MEP still has a shadowy theoretical foundation.…”