1999
DOI: 10.21236/ada461922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Basis for Joint Interoperability

Abstract: How can the Services benefit from a more detailed description of the basis for joint interoperability? Without interoperable systems, we cannot truly have "joint operations." Instead, we have a collection of forces from more than one service --and possibly even from more than one country --conducting independent operations in the same geographical area. We cannot work together in a cooperative, coordinated, mutually supportive effort to win on the battlefield if we cannot communicate, and communication is depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The r e SE structures were obtained via a weighted least-squares fit to the semiexperimental moments of inertia. It is difficult to estimate the precision of the moments of inertia; thus, the iterative reweighted least-squares method (IRLS) was used. , Huber’s weighting, whereby the residuals e i are gradually weighted down when they are larger than approximately 2 × MAD, was employed. The MAD (mean absolute deviation) is the median | e i – median( e i )|.…”
Section: Methods Of Structure Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The r e SE structures were obtained via a weighted least-squares fit to the semiexperimental moments of inertia. It is difficult to estimate the precision of the moments of inertia; thus, the iterative reweighted least-squares method (IRLS) was used. , Huber’s weighting, whereby the residuals e i are gradually weighted down when they are larger than approximately 2 × MAD, was employed. The MAD (mean absolute deviation) is the median | e i – median( e i )|.…”
Section: Methods Of Structure Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each step, an analysis of the residuals permitted checking the appropriateness of the weights and the compatibility of the rotational constants and the predicate observations. It is possible to automate, at least partly, this procedure by using the Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) method, whereby data with large residuals are weighted down. , Two weighting schemes are used: Huber weighting, where the weight linearly decreases as the residual increases, and biweight weighting, where, in addition, data with large residuals are eliminated.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each step, an analysis of the residuals permitted checking the appropriateness of the weights and the compatibility of the rotational constants and the predicate observations. It is possible to automate, at least partly, this procedure by using the iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) method, whereby data with large residuals are weighted down. , The advantage of the IRLS method is that it is robust, i.e., it mitigates the influence of outliers. Two different weighting schemes are used in this study: Huber weighting, where the weight linearly decreases as the residual increases, and biweight weighting, where, in addition, data with large residuals are eliminated.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%