2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr008799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian approach for inverse modeling, data assimilation, and conditional simulation of spatial random fields

Abstract: [1] This paper addresses the inverse problem in spatially variable fields such as hydraulic conductivity in groundwater aquifers or rainfall intensity in hydrology. Common to all these problems is the existence of a complex pattern of spatial variability of the target variables and observations, the multiple sources of data available for characterizing the fields, the complex relations between the observed and target variables and the multiple scales and frequencies of the observations. The method of anchored … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior field uncertainty encompassed a large range of different geostatistical models, which calls into question the common practice in hydrogeology of fixing the variogram model before inversion. For the considered case study, the serial version of our method appears to be more computationally efficient than both the SGS algorithm of Hansen et al [2012Hansen et al [ , 2013aHansen et al [ , 2013b and the MAD method of Rubin et al [2010]. The advantages of the proposed approach are even more apparent when executed on a distributed computing network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The posterior field uncertainty encompassed a large range of different geostatistical models, which calls into question the common practice in hydrogeology of fixing the variogram model before inversion. For the considered case study, the serial version of our method appears to be more computationally efficient than both the SGS algorithm of Hansen et al [2012Hansen et al [ , 2013aHansen et al [ , 2013b and the MAD method of Rubin et al [2010]. The advantages of the proposed approach are even more apparent when executed on a distributed computing network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The MAD method (see Rubin et al [2010], for an extensive description) is especially designed for inference of (multi-)Gaussian parameter fields. It differs from classical Bayesian inference methods in the treatment of the likelihood function, L hjd ð Þ p djh ð Þ.…”
Section: Comparison Against the Methods Of Anchored Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations