2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8248640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Approach to Competing Risks Model with Masked Causes of Failure and Incomplete Failure Times

Abstract: We present a Bayesian approach for analysis of competing risks survival data with masked causes of failure. This approach is often used to assess the impact of covariates on the hazard functions when the failure time is exactly observed for some subjects but only known to lie in an interval of time for the remaining subjects. Such data, known as partly interval-censored data, usually result from periodic inspection in production engineering. In this study, Dirichlet and Gamma processes are assumed as priors fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the Clayton [13] formula, suppose the observed data is D = N ij (t), Y ij (t), X where N ij (t) represents the counting process of failures due to cause j, occurring up to time t and Y ij (t) being the at risk indicator for cause j. Note that the same formulation was used in Yousif et al [10]; however, the definition of Y ij (t) is quite different. Let dN ij (t) be a small increment of N ij (t) over interval [t, t + dt).…”
Section: Bayesian Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilizing the Clayton [13] formula, suppose the observed data is D = N ij (t), Y ij (t), X where N ij (t) represents the counting process of failures due to cause j, occurring up to time t and Y ij (t) being the at risk indicator for cause j. Note that the same formulation was used in Yousif et al [10]; however, the definition of Y ij (t) is quite different. Let dN ij (t) be a small increment of N ij (t) over interval [t, t + dt).…”
Section: Bayesian Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier, Miyakawa [9] discussed this type of data by considering parametric and non-parametric approaches to reliability estimation. Previously, we developed a Bayesian approach to estimate the effect of explanatory variables motivated by incomplete data with masked causes of failure [10,11]. We discussed the effect of covariates on CIF in the presence of a moderate masking level, and preliminary results were introduced [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the scarcity of data is a recurrent problem when dealing with life-long products or high MTBF equipment. Recent references (Zhang et al, 2019;Leoni et al, 2021, Yousif et al, 2020 calculate point and interval estimation for the Weibull model according to Bayesian, MLE, and LSE methods. Although the differences fall within a reasonable range for limited censored times, the first performs better, which suggests its use in further research.…”
Section: Preventivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable number of studies have been carried out on parameter estimation using mask data based on ORTs since it was first introduced by [1,2]. Considering different failure distributions, Guess et al [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] utilizes the MLE technique for estimating model parameters for a single component or a series or parallel systems of two or three components, whereas Reiser et al [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] considered BE technique based on different priors. As it was discussed earlier, many real-life systems or machines these days are made of hybrid structures which are a combination of series and parallel subsystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%